SAP P_SAPEA_2023 Dumps Questions Answers

EA principles are the foundational statements that guide the prioritization and execution of initiatives in alignment with business and IT strategic objectives. Each of the objectives and decisions on the left should align with the principle that best supports it.

Here is the best correlation between the objectives/decisions and the EA principles:

Minimize water loss during Lithium extraction

Ensure legal and regulatory compliance and minimize environmental impact.

Reluctant to move Core to Cloud but open to consider cloud for collaboration

Adopt common use applications and balance best practice with best of breed.

Smart Battery, Charge and Insta-Perpetual Warranty initiatives

Maximize business agility and use innovation.

Substitute bespoke applications

Minimize technology diversity and complexity and subscribe before buy before build.

Total cost of ownership optimization

Maximize business applications and innovation.

These alignments are based on the understanding that the principles should enable and support the objectives and decisions. For example, environmental compliance is directly supported by the principle of legal and regulatory compliance, while the move to the cloud for collaboration aligns with adopting common applications. The initiative for smart batteries correlates with driving business agility and fostering innovation. Replacing bespoke applications with standardized solutions aligns with minimizing technology diversity, and the principle of maximizing applications and innovation supports the objective of optimizing total ownership costs.

For the Chief Enterprise Architect at Wanderlust, it is crucial to map stakeholders according to their stance on the transformation project, which will inform the approach for engagement and communication. The categorization into proponents, opponents, enthusiasts, and resistors is based on the stakeholder's level of support and their readiness for change.

Here's the categorization based on the provided stakeholder feedback:

SCM SPP Application Owner in IT- Enthusiasts: This stakeholder has begun upskilling in S/4 HANA eSPP, indicating a positive attitude towards the transformation and readiness to embrace new systems.

Wanderlust Greenbush, Australia Plant Head- Opponents: The plant head discourages consolidation of instances due to the need for flexibility and frequent regulatory changes, showing resistance to the transformation project.

Wanderlust Europe Business Head- Promoters: The business head favors consolidation to improve end-to-end visibility of the battery supply chain, which indicates support for the transformation initiative.

Dealer Management Application Owner in IT- Resistors: Preferring continuity due to heavy customization and niche business requirements suggests resistance to change, likely driven by fear of losing position or control over the existing system.

For successful transformation, the Chief Enterprise Architect should actively engage with each type of stakeholder differently, working to mitigate concerns, leveraging enthusiasm, and turning opposition into support wherever possible.

The connection between SAP's Business Process Model (BPM) and the Business Capability Model (BCM) lies in how the end-to-end business processes are enabled by the business domains and capabilities outlined in the BCM. Each business activity in the BPM is supported by one or more business capabilities from the BCM. This linkage ensures that the company’s capabilities are directly tied to the business activities and processes, providing a clear line of sight from high-level business strategy down to operational execution.References= This connection is standard in enterprise architecture where processes are designed to be supported by capabilities, ensuring that capabilities provide the necessary functions to execute the processes effectively.