L4M1 Scope and Influence of Procurement and Supply Questions and Answers

A basic response would include:

- What a Corporate Governance Framework is - the system of rules, practices and processes which directs and controls a company. Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose.

- Impact this has on policies and processes – means the procurement department follows regulatory mechanisms (e.g. financial regulations, Codes of Practices), has a checks and balances system (such as auditing), uses e-procurement technologies, vets staff and suppliers, has a clear segregation of duties etc.

This is a very open question and there are so many correct answers. In fact, it’s quite hard to give a wrong answer to this question – as long as your response explains a policy or process that a procurement department can have that ensures they’re following Corporate Governance – that’s right!

A good response may mention:

- Corporate governance is in essence a ‘toolkit’ that allows an organisation to effectively manage itself, ensuring that it’s policies and procedures are compliant with legislation and are ethical. It also ensures that the company meets its objectives.

- The impact Corporate Governance has on the procurement department will be in mandating the ways in which goods and services are procured and in the general ways of working of the procurement department.

- In your response you should mention 5 (ish) different ways Corporate Governance would impact on how procurement do their job. Examples include:

- Ethical Conduct – corporate governance ensures that the company is operating in a legal and ethical way. This influences the processes Procurement will do and the type of suppliers they will engage with. This may also be in their approach to relationships and negotiations- seeking out collaborative relationships with suppliers rather than looking to exploit them. For example, an organisation that does not have a Corporate Governance structure may look to take advantage of suppliers and achieve the lowest cost possible at the expense of the supply chain and local community. An organisation that has strong Corporate Governance would work with suppliers, developing the relationships and thinking long-term about the impact on the local community. The organisation may therefore prioritisestandards such as Fair Trade over price, and this would be reflected in the way tenders are evaluated by the procurement department.

- Use of Checks and Balance system- Corporate Governance ensures strong financial controls are implemented throughout the organisation. For the procurement department this may result in purchases being made to strict budgets (rather than just spending whatever they want), and business cases being written up and approved before the organisation spends a large amount of money on a single item. Another impact may be in the use of audits. For example, peer reviewing tenders and contract awards to ensue all members of the Procurement Team are following internal processes correctly.

- Anti-fraud prevention mechanisms. An important area of Corporate Governance is ensuring the organisation is free from fraud and corruption. This impacts on Procurement’s policies and processes as it will mean scrutinising tenders and who is being awarded contracts. It may result in high levels of Due Diligence being completed on suppliers before entering into contracts and providing a whistle-blowing service for staff to report issues.

- Security measures- this will be to protect the organisation from risk. It may include the procurement department vetting new staff by completing background checks. It may also involve the segregation of procurement duties so that no individual has too much power. E.g. one person raises the requisition and another person approves the purchase. Security may also be in ways of working such as password protecting documentation and limiting access to confidential information.

- Use of a Purchasing Policy Manual – this provides operational guidance on procurement policies and procedures to all staff members. It may detail things like who has permission to order what, who the Delegated Purchasing Authority (DPA) is and the roles and responsibilities of the team.

An excellent response may also include

- Reasons why Corporate Governance Frameworks impact on procurement policies and practices. This could include reasons of accountability, reputation and risk management, procurement’s links with other departments.

- You could also look at what processes would look like with Corporate Governance compared to without it (with CG = rule driven, autocratic but organisation is protected from risk. Without CG = laissez-faire, everyone does whatever they like, very risky)

- You could also provide further examples, either real life or hypothetical. Investopedia has some great information and examples you could use: Corporate Governance Definition: How It Works (investopedia.com)

How to approach the question

- This question is worth 25 marks so you can imagine what the mark scheme will look like. There are 5 Rights so there will be 5 points for each Right. Naming the Right will be one point, then you have 4 points for a description and example. You should therefore aim to have 4-5 sentences per Right.

- I would recommend using headings for this type of essay- clearly putting your essay into 5 sections for each right. This makes it easy for the examiner to mark.

Proposed Essay structure

- Introduction – what is meant by the 5 Rights

- Price

- Quality

- Quantity

- Time

- Place

- Conclusion – why it’s important, all rights are equally as important

Example Essay

Procurement revolves around achieving the delicate balance of acquiring goods and/ or services at the right price, quality, quantity, time, and place. This essay explains why these "Five Rights of Procurement" are important and explains how using this metric can help procurement to make smart choices when they purchase goods or services.

Price:

Firstly, it is important that procurement do not simply seek to find the cheapest option. The First Right is about finding the product/ service at an affordable price that doesn't compromise on quality. Let's say a company is buying office furniture. They might go for a supplier that offers a good balance between cost and quality, ensuring they get good value for their money. Considerations here may include Total Cost of Ownership, the Price Iceberg, and Whole Life Costing. The company therefore may seek to get the best price, but in relation to how long the furniture will last. A cheap chair that will break after one year may not be the best price compared to another chair which will last 10 years.

Quality:

The second right, quality, looks at legal compliance and fitness for purpose. Quality adherence aligns with specifications as well as legislation such as the UK Sale of Goods Act 1979. This helps ensure that items meet their commonly intended purpose and maintains satisfactory condition. Buyers deploy both reactive measures like Quality Control and proactive approaches like Quality Assurance to uphold the stipulated quality. This commitment not only ensures legal compliance but also underpins customer satisfaction, brand reputation, and ethical sourcing policies. An example of quality is an organisation buying a washing machine that conforms to ISO standard 97.060 and has a 2-year warrantee.

Quantity:

The third right, quantity, is a strategic consideration about how much of an item to order. It is connected to efficient inventory management. One tool that procurement can use to ensure they order the right quantity of a product is Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) – this serves as a tool for finding the equilibrium between stock-holding costs and avoiding stockouts. Market conditions, supply chain dynamics (e.g. JIT / Lean manufacturing), and organizational policies collectively play a pivotal role in determining the right quantity. For example a confectionary manufacturer will need to order the right number of eggs to make cakes- they will need to consider how many eggs they will need in order to make the cakes, but also take into consideration that they may not need them all at onceand that eggs can expire. The use of an MRP system is helpful when determining quantities of products to order.

Time:

Time is about getting things when we need them. In the above example, an egg delivery timing for a confectionary manufacturer will be pivotal to making the cakes on time. Other considerations about time include changing market forces and customer demand. The use of forecasting is therefore extremely useful; particularly if there are peaks in demand for a product, such as toys at Christmas. Moreover, organizations need to avoid bottlenecks and production stoppages, so time (including lead time and delivery time) is an important consideration when making orders.

Place:

Lastly, place is about getting things to the right location. Minimizing environmental impact, reducing risks during transit, and optimizing warehousing practices contribute to achieving the right place. This is particularly important for perishable items such as food, and for items which require specific storage conditions such as chemicals. This involves good planning in terms of logistics, minimizing any impact on the environment during transport and a consideration for safety.

In conclusion, the Five Rights of Procurement provide a structured framework for organizations to optimize their sourcing practices. All rights are equally as important and it is the relationship between the Rights which is key. While price, quality, quantity, time, and place form the foundation, evolving models acknowledge additional elements like the Right Relationship with the Supplier. Embracing these principles not only ensures operational efficiency but also promotes sustainability and ethical conduct throughout the procurement process, contributing to long-term success in a globalized and dynamic marketplace.

Tutor Notes

- The 5 Rights is a big topic in CIPS so do learn them off by heart. It’s p. 20 in the study guide.

- The conclusion mentions that additional ‘rights’ are starting to be introduced into the matrix, this is true and isn’t mentioned in this study guide. I believe this starts to come up in Level 5. Just something to be aware of- some people are now talking about other Rights such as finding the right supplier and the right relationship. It’s good to know, but not essential for this essay. Neither is knowing the ISO standard for washing machines – that’s certainly not in the book. You can sprinkle in your own knowledge to essays like this, as it demonstrates you’re able to apply the theory to real life. Why I remember the ISO for washing machines is a different story….

- You could also have mentioned the following topics;

o price – using the right currency and incoterm, aggregation of spend, negotiating prices

o quality – conformance and performance specs

o quantity – fulfilling retail orders, large order quantities leading to discount

o time – additional costs of a stockout, impact on relationships and reputation

o place – additional costs if delivery fails

- This is the type of question you can easily over-write. It’s a huge topic and you could easily spend too long on it and not have enough time to answer other questions. So be careful with your timings. You don’t need to mention everything above.

- Another way this type of question can come up is as a scenario. E.g. XYZ is a manufacturer of cakes and needs to order eggs. Discuss how XYZ can ensure the 5 Rights of Procurement when ordering Eggs.

How to approach this question

- This question is very vague. Sometimes CIPS do this. It allows for you to be a bit more free in your response, but can also be quite stressful because you don’t 100% know what they’re after.

- For this question we’re looking at competitions, so full tenders where lots of suppliers are invited to bid for an opportunity. This means the type of things we could be discussing include; IP, cartels, merger controls and monopolies.

Example Essay

Procurement professionals operate within a legal framework that regulates competition, aiming to ensure fair business practices and prevent anti-competitive behaviour. Three critical areas of regulation related to competition that procurement professionals should be aware of include intellectual property, cartels, and merger controls.

Intellectual Property (IP):

Intellectual property encompasses creations of the mind, such as inventions, designs, and brand names, protected by law. In the context of procurement, understanding intellectual property is essential when dealing with suppliers' products, technologies, or services that may involve intellectual property rights.

Procurement professionals must be aware of the intellectual property rights associated with the goods or services they are procuring. This includes respecting patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets owned by suppliers. Due diligence is crucial to ensure that the products or services being procured do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, requiring verification of legal ownership and legitimacy. An example of something procurement should look out for include ensuring goods are authentic and not counterfeit.

Cartels:

Cartels involve agreements between competitors to control prices, manipulate markets, or restrict competition. For procurement professionals, it is imperative to be vigilant and avoid engaging in or unintentionally supporting cartel activities. Procurement professionals should refrain from participating in anti-competitive behaviour, such as bid-rigging or price-fixing, which are common cartel activities. This involves not colluding with suppliers or competitors to manipulate procurement processes. Maintaining open and fair competition is essential, ensuring that procurement processes remain transparent, competitive, and free from attempts to distort market dynamics, thereby preventing the formation of cartels and promoting a level playing field.

One notable example involved the construction industry in the UK. In 2019, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) fined three major suppliers to the construction industry for participating in a cartel. The companies, which supplied concrete drainage products, were found to have coordinated their behaviour to share markets, fix prices, and rig bids.The investigation revealed that these companies had breached competition law by engaging in anti-competitive practices that limited competition and negatively impacted customers. The fines imposed were part of the CMA's efforts to deter and penalize such cartel behaviour, emphasizing the importance of fair competition in procurement. The Directors of the companies have also been banned from undertaking the role of Director of any company for 12 years.

Merger Controls:

Merger controls are regulations overseeing the consolidation of companies, mergers, and acquisitions to prevent monopolistic practices and protect fair competition. Procurement professionals need to be aware of these regulations, especially when dealing with suppliers undergoing mergers or acquisitions.

Staying informed about mergers and acquisitions within the supplier base is crucial. If a key supplier undergoes such changes, it may impact the stability of the supply chain or alter market dynamics. Procurement professionals need to be aware of potential changes in supplier relationships, pricing structures, or product/service availability resulting from mergers. Engaging in proactive risk management and contingency planning is necessary to mitigate any negative impacts on procurement operations.

Mergers are actively watched in the UK by the Competition and Markets Authority, and where rules are broken, the CMA can intervene and even prevent mergers from happening. A notable example of this was the attempted merger between JD Sports and Footasylum – the companies were fined millions of pounds for exchanging information and attempting to collude and distort the marketplace.

In conclusion, procurement professionals play a crucial role in navigating these regulatory landscapes effectively. Understanding intellectual property, avoiding cartel activities, and staying informed about merger controls contribute to fostering fair and transparent competition within the marketplace.

Tutor Notes

- The construction example of a cartel can be found here Supply of precast concrete drainage products: civil investigation - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but feel free to use your own!

- The JD/ Footasylum one is here: JD Sports and Footasylum fined £4.7m for competition breach - BBC News. Basically, the CMA got involved because the two firms were sharing private information and having secret meetings, with the intention that they could combine. The CMA thought it was super dodgy and that it would distort the trainer / footwear market in the UK so they fined the companies and told them to stop it.

- The study guide is a bit light on this topic, so I would do a bit of extra research and have an example in your back pocket for if you need it. P. 142

If you want an example of IP issues- Shein is a great company to look at- ‘They took my world’: fashion giant Shein accused of art theft | Art and design | The Guardian

- Definition of ‘structured procurement process’ – when an organisation provides a sequence of actions / steps to take to get the outcome (the procurement of an item). This involves an organisation providing guidelines and instructions of how things should be done. Basically following a step-by-step process.

- Why this is important – Ensures all tasks that need to be done are done, maintains consistency, prevents conflict and suboptimal behaviour, improves efficiency, better managerial control, compliance (with laws and standards), assists with continuous improvement, may result in time/ cost savings, reduces risks such as fraudulent spending.

Example essay:

The first part of the question is worth 10 points, so you could include a few of the following points. It would also be good to include examples:

- Structured procurement involves creating rules on how procurement should be done

- This is in contrast to reactive / maverick spending

- May come about due to company policy, external regulations or through trying to achieve Competitive Advantage

- Examples include an organisation having set procedures for ordering items of different spend- e.g. Procurement Assistants can purchase items up to £500. Items between £500-£1000 require a manager’s approval and anything over £1000 requires a written Business Case in order to procure

- Structures Procurement Processes will usually also include the use of a designated e-procurement tool. E.g. an organisation may insist that all tenders use a certain online system and that invoices are sent via X system within 30 days.

The second part of the question is worth slightly more points, so spend more time on this. You could put each of the reasons why it is important in a separate paragraph. Also use examples where you can;

- Ensures all tasks that need to be done are done- having structured processes means having a step-by-step guide to how to procure. This means activities are well co-ordinated and there are no gaps, no duplications of effort and no conflicting efforts. It may involve assigning different people in the team different roles e.g. someone makes the requisition and someone else approves it. It also means that nothing is forgotten.

- Maintains consistency- having standardised processes means each procurement exercise follows the same process. This may include using a standard template for a requisition or ITT. Where there is consistency, this results in time being saved and less mistakes being made as everyone (including supply partners) is familiar with the processes.

- Prevents conflict and suboptimal behaviour- in organisations that use structured procurement processes everyone does the same. This means there is no conflict (e.g. one person doing things one way and another person does it differently and arguing which way is best). It also means no one can do procurement ‘wrong’ – there are written guides and procedures to follow. This is particularly helpful for new starters.

- Efficiency – time and money can be saved where there are standard procedures as people don’t have to plan each procurement activity individually. Structured Procurement Processes may also involve completing bulk orders and co-ordinating activity within the organisation which means less orders are placed over the year and efficiency savings can be made. For example, a factory may create an order of cleaning products once a quarter, compared to ordering products just as and when they are required. This will save time of the procurement department overall throughout the year and allows them to focus on other more value-adding tasks.

- Better managerial control – Managers have more oversight when using structured procurement. There are clear rules as to when managers need to be involved and provide sign-off. This visibility makes it easier for managers to make decisions and allows for early intervention where someone needs assistance. It will reduce maverick spending and fraudulent spending. For example, it is much harder to provide kick-backs to suppliers when there are clear processes and audit trails and managers have visibility over all processes.

- Compliance (with laws and standards) – particularly in the Public Sector there are rules and regulations regarding procurement practices. Using standardised processes allows organisations to demonstrate compliance with appropriate legislation. It also protects them from ‘challenge’. This is when a bidder who is unsuccessful challenges the decision to award a contract to someone else. Using a structured procurement process allows the organisation to demonstrate that they procured the item correctly and the challenge is unfounded.

Tutor Notes

- This topic isn’t as well explained in the new study guide as it used to be. It’s all pretty obvious stuff but the language is slightly different. The guide now talks about ‘compliance with processes’ and the benefits this brings. Which is exactly the same as why do you follow a structured process. This is on p. 114.

- If you’re feeling clever, you could mention the difference between Public and Private Sector- e.g. a private organisation may use standardised processes for efficiency and cost savings, whereas a public sector organisation may use it more for compliance purposes.

The knowledge to remember: 

A table with text on it Description automatically generated

Essay Plan :

Remember to include examples for each of the six categories of spend. This is specifically asked for in the question so it’s important to include as many examples as you can. To do this you could take an example organisation such as a cake manufacturer and explain which of their purchases would fall into each category and why.

Introduction – explain why procurement categorises spend

- Direct – these are items that are incorporated into the final goods (the cakes) so would include raw materials such as flour, eggs, sugar etc

- Indirect – these are items that the company needs, but don’t go into the end product. For example, cleaning products and MRO supplies for the machines

- Capital Expenditure- these are large one-off purchases, such as buying a new piece of equipment such as a giant oven to cook the cakes.

- Operational Expenditure – these are purchases that are required to ensure the business can function day-to-day. They may include PPE for the workers in the factory and cleaning equipment

- Stock items – these are items procured in advance and held in inventory until they are needed. In a cake manufacturing factory this could be PPE for staff such as hairnets and gloves. The organisation will buy these in bulk and keep them in a stock cupboard, using these as and when they are required

- Non- stock items - items that are not stored and used right away. An example would be eggs- these will need to be put directly into the cakes as they would go off if bought in advance.

Conclusion – the categories are not mutually exclusive – an item can be direct and operational, or indirect and stock. Different companies may use different systems to classify items of spend.

Example Introduction and Conclusion

Introduction

Procurement categorizes spend to efficiently manage resources and make strategic decisions. Three primary ways of categorizing procurement spend include distinguishing between direct and indirect spend, classifying expenditures as capital or operational, and categorizing items as stock or non-stock. These distinctions aid organizations in optimizing their procurement strategies for better resource allocation.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, categorizing procurement spend into direct vs. indirect, capital vs. operational, and stock vs. non-stock items is essential for strategic resource management. While these categories provide a structured framework, they are not mutually exclusive, as an item can fall into multiple categories. For example, an item may be both direct and operational or indirect and stock. The flexibility of these categories allows organizations to tailor their procurement strategies based on their specific needs, ensuring efficient resource allocation and effective supply chain management. Different companies may adopt varying categorization approaches depending on their industry, size, and operational requirements.

Tutor notes:

- Because you’ve got 6 categories of spend to talk about you’re only going to need 3-4 sentences for each. Providing you’ve said the category, explained what it is and given one example, you’ll absolutely fly through this type of question

- You could also mention that it is useful to use categories of spend as this helps with budgeting. Different categories may also have different processes to follow for procuring the item (this could form part of your introduction or conclusion).

- This subject is LO 1.3.2 it’s quite spread out in the text book but the main info is on p.49

- Note- different companies/ industries classify items of spend differently. Particularly packaging and salaries. Some say they’re direct costs and some say they’re indirect costs. Honestly, it’s a hotly debated subject and I don’t think there is a right or wrong. I’d just avoid those two examples if you can and stick to ones that aren’t as contentious like eggs and PPE.

How to approach this question:

- Your response will need 5 definitions. For 25 points that means 5 points per section so think about the level of detail you’ll need to include. It would be 5 points for electronic system (i.e. your introduction and conclusion), and then do a paragraph on each of the technologies. In the description you could talk about why it’s used and the advantages, and give some examples if you know any.

- Definition of electronic system – a system which uses some form of technology and automates a procurement process than would otherwise have been completed manually.

- E-Requisitioning – a way of ordering goods or services. Includes the use of integrated ordering systems such as: ERP/ ERP II / MRP / MRP II

- E-Catalogue- an electronic display of what goods can be ordered. A simple example of this may be a supplier displaying the goods they offer on their website and the prices to purchase the goods.

- E-Sourcing – this involves the early stages of the tender process- using an electronic portal to find a supplier and / or conduct a tender exercise.

- E-Payment – the P2P part of the cycle (procure to pay) – may involve electronic POs and Invoices, BACS, CHAPS and SWIFT payment systems, and the use of Purchasing Cards

Example essay:

Electronic systems, commonly refered to as E-procurement, is the business-to-business or business-to-consumer purchase of goods or services, typically using the Internet or other information/ networking systems such as ERP systems. It has developed in the past 20 years as technology has improved and replaces time-consuming manual processes and is now considered the ‘norm’. Electronic systems and e-procurement can be used throughout the entire supply chain- not just between a single buyer and supplier. Examples of electronic systems including the following:

E-requisitioning

This is often used in manufacturing organisations to order raw materials. An electronic ‘bill of materials’ is created and stock levels are automatically updated. As materials get used and a pre-determined level is reached, this triggers a new order which is placed via an e-requisitioning system such as MRP. It is a technological version of the traditional kan-ban (2 bin) system. E-requisition tools are often cloud-based. It helps buyers simplify the buying process, track orders and provides higher levels of visibility on spend. The main disadvantage to this technology is that it requires technology interfacing between the buyer and suppler, which may be expensive.

E-catalogues

This is a digital or online version of a catalogue- a document that details what you can buy and at what price. There are two main types – buy side catalogues and sell side catalogues. A buy-side catalogue is an internal system used by a buyer which hosts a list of pre-approved suppliers from whom purchases can be made. It may include details of commonly bought items and the prices. The use of this reduces maverick spending and ensures consistency in purchases (e.g. whenever lightbulbs need to be ordered, the same lightbulbs are ordered so the office lighting is consistent). A sell-side catalogue is provided by a supplier and details what they offer- it often includes prices, any discounts for bulk buying and may also let buyers know of availability (e.g. the website may say only two items remaining). This may be as simple as a price list on their website, available for anyone to view.

E-sourcing

This is a tool that helps a buyer find the most suitable supplier. Examples include e-tendering websites where a buyer can host a competition to find a supplier. E-auctions are also a type of e-sourcing tool. The tool (often a website) hosts all of the tendering documents and allows for buyers and suppliers to communicate during the tender process (for example if there are any clarifications needed on the specification). Using this tool allows for transparency and equal treatment, but also saves time in completing the tender exercise. PQQs can be automated and some e-sourcing tools include the use of Artificial Intelligence which can ‘read’ tender submissions and automatically exclude suppliers who do not fulfil the required criteria.

E-payment technologies

These are methods to pay for goods and services that replace the need for cash and cheques. Examples include online bank transfers, electronic Purchase Orders and Invoices and the use of Pre-Payment cards. These act like credit cards for employees to use when they need to buy supplies. For example, if you have a maintenance team that frequently need to purchase low-value items like screws and paint, you could issue the team with a Pre-Payment card with a certain limit (e.g. £500/ month) so they can buy what they need. The company will then automatically be sent a monthly invoice for all of the purchases. This saves time from having to issue the maintenance team with petty cash for the purchases and allows for greater visibility over spend (e.g. how many screws are typically bought per year?). Another typical use is for staff travel.

In conclusion, procurement teams benefit significantly from leveraging electronic tools, including e-requisitioning, e-catalogues, e-sourcing, and e-payment technologies. The adoption of these electronic tools brings about various advantages that enhance efficiency, transparency, cost-effectiveness, and overall effectiveness in the procurement process. Moreover E-procurement tools has helped develop the procurement function into a professional and respected function and allows for a more pro-active rather than reactive approach to purchasing.

Tutor Notes:

- Fun Fact! In the public sector, it is mandated that electronic systems are used in procurement (Public Contract Regulations 2015) as this helps to achieve the objectives of transparency and equal treatment. Where manual systems are used, it is easy to manipulate the tender process. For example, a buyer could read some tender submissions before the deadline for submission and no one would know, but with an electronic system this is impossible as it locks evaluators out until the deadline has passed and all bidders have submitted their responses. (note PCR 2015 is being replaced in 2024- details are still TBC but the above fun fact will still remain in the new legislation- they’re definitely still going to make it compulsory).

- You could also mention the names of systems if you know any. For example, e-sourcing tools include MyTenders.com and Delta E-Sourcing. PO / Invoice systems include Sage, Xero and QuickBooks.

- The question doesn’t ask for advantages of using these technologies but you could mention this in your answer. Just be sure that this isn’t the focus of your response- the question asks specifically for you to DESCRIBE the systems so detailed Explanation: s and examples are where you will secure the most points.

- p.108

- Mention of some of the following benefits with at least one example provided against each; cost savings, time savings, more efficient, higher levels of transparency, easier to access historical records to inform upon decision making, mitigates risks such as fraudulent spending, easier to track spend against budgets, ensures compliance with regulations, provides ‘real-time’ information, paperless communications (so more environmentally friendly), assists in Supply Chain Management and integration with supply partners.

- I’d suggest 5 is a good amount to aim for

Example Essay

Procurement stands to gain numerous benefits from the adoption of electronic systems. These electronic tools and systems bring efficiency, accuracy, transparency, and cost-effectiveness to the procurement process. Here are several compelling reasons why procurement should leverage electronic systems:

Cost savings – the use of electronic tools saves organisations money. Although there is an initial cost outlay, over time the systems will save the organisation money. For example the use of e-procurement tools can save money by accessing a wider pool of suppliers. For example, when using an e-sourcing portal, a tender may reach a larger number of suppliers- this makes the tender more competitive thus driving down prices. Compared to traditional methods such as phoning suppliers for prices, the use of electronic portals encourages suppliers to ‘sharpen their pencils’ and provide the best prices in order to win work. Money is also saved as communication is digital (so there is no costs for paper and postage).

Time savings – electronic tools automate a lot of processes which saves time. An example of this is e-requisitioning tools where orders can be placed automatically by a piece oftechnology when quantities of a material reach a certain level. For example, in a cake manufacturing organisation they may use an MRP system which calculates how many eggs are required per day. The machine knows that when the company only have 50 eggs left, a new order needs to be issued to the supplier. The MRP system (e-requisitioning system) therefore saves time as the Procurement department doesn’t have to manually pick up the phone to place the order with the supplier- it is done automatically.

Access to higher levels of information - e-Procurement gives you centralised access to all your data. You can access the system to look at historical purchases with ease compared to having to dig through folders and filing cabinets. For example, an electronic PO system will hold details of all historical POs, this means if someone has a question about a PO that was raised 4 months ago, finding the information is much easier and quicker. Some systems may also be able to provide analytical data such as changes to spend over time, or which suppliers a buyer spends the most money with. This higher level of information can help inform upon future decision making. For example, if the organisation wishes to consolidate its supplier base it would look through historical data provided by the electronic system to find out which suppliers are used the least and remove these from the ‘pre-approved supplier list’. This level of data might not be available in manual systems.

Better budget tracking – using electronic systems allows for real-time information to be collected which allows Procurement Managers to see where spend is compared to forecasts and budgets. An example of this is in the use of Pre-Payment Cards – rather than giving staff members petty cash to make transactions and having to chase this up and collect receipts and change, a pre-payment card usually comes with an online portal where a manager can see what has been purchased and the remaining budget on that card for the month. A manager may be able to see for example that a member of staff has spend £300 of their allotted £500 monthly allowance.

Higher levels of transparency and control – using E-procurement tools allows an organisation to track who is ordering what. For example, an e-requisitioning tool may allow Procurement Assistants to make purchases up to £500 but set an automatic escalation if they try to buy something of higher value. This allows for Management to have greater levels of visibility and more control over spending. Another example of transparency and control is in the use of e-sourcing tools to run a competitive tender exercise. All communication between the buyer and suppliers is tracked on the system and award letters can be sent via the system too. This reduces the risk of information being lost.

Environmental benefits- the use of e-procurement tools means that there is less paperwork involved. For example, rather than creating a physical PO which needs to be signed by a manager, an electronic system can allow a manager to sign-off the purchase by clicking a button. This means there is no requirement for the document to be printed. This saves paper and thus has a positive on the environment. Using electronic systems may help an organisation achieve their environmental targets.

In conclusion there are numerous benefits for procurement to adopt e-procurement tools. Depending on the sector and requirements of each individualised company, some advantages may be more pertinent than others, but it is undeniable that technology is helping to shape the industry into a value adding function of organisations.

Tutor Notes

- With an essay like this you could use subheadings and number the advantages if you like. It’s a good idea to do one advantage per paragraph and using formatting really helps the examiner to read your essay.

- study guide p.108

How to approach this question:

- There are 4 sections to this essay, so before you start writing I’d make a couple of notes on each of the points. Then build those notes into separate paragraphs. Your notes may look like this:

How to manage the contract – ensuring contract is fit for purpose, holding XYZ to their responsibilities, ensuring ABC are also fulfilling their responsibilities, issuing contract variations if required, planning for contingencies.

- How to manage the supplier – ensure the right relationship is in place (transactional vs collaborative), communication – open and honest, ensure there is mutual trust and understanding of each other’s goals/ objectives.

- Ways of monitoring performance – use KPIs / SLAs, Supplier Scorecard, Vendor Rating, feedback from customers

- How to add value for ABC – increasing efficiencies (e.g. less product defects), improved quality, assisting with Value Engineering exercises, reduction in time and costs (e.g. through improved processes such as ordering), the supplier delivers ‘extras’ for ABC such as training to staff at no additional cost.

- Ensure each paragraph refers to Jan, ABC and XYZ. The question doesn’t state what the businesses are buying/ selling so you can use this as an opportunity to provide examples: ‘if ABC are procuring raw materials from XYZ such as metal, an effective way to manage performance would include …. If they are procuring a service, it may be more beneficial to use …. methodology’

Example Essay

Jan, the Contracts Manager at ABC Ltd, plays a pivotal role in ensuring the success of the recently awarded contract with XYZ Ltd. Efficient contract and supplier management involves careful planning, communication, performance monitoring, and the continuous addition of value. Here's how Jan can navigate these aspects:

In terms of contract management, Jan must ensure that the terms and conditions of the contract are "fit for purpose," aligning with the specific needs and complexity of the procurement. For instance, a simple goods procurement may necessitate a concise document, while more intricate projects like engineering endeavors may require a detailed contract such as a JCT or NEC contract. Additionally, Jan should vigilantly manage the contract during its lifespan, addressing any potential 'scope creep' that might necessitate amendments. If the contract lacks provisions for such changes, Jan may need to initiate the creation of a new contract to accommodate evolving needs

Clear delineation of responsibilities and contingencies is crucial in the contract to ensure accountability and preparedness for unforeseen circumstances. The inclusion of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and damage clauses, where appropriate, adds a layer of clarity and accountability to the contractual relationship. Planning for contingencies involves having backup strategies in place, especially considering potential challenges that may arise during the collaboration with XYZ Ltd. For example, having other suppliers she can call upon if XYZ fail to deliver on an order.

Turning to supplier management, Jan's role involves fostering a positive and productive relationship with XYZ Ltd. This includes regular meetings to discuss progress, achievements, and future plans. A mobilization meeting is particularly important to ensure a strong start to the contract. Subsequent monthly or quarterly meetings provide a platform to review performance retrospectively and plan for the future. Additionally, effective communication is paramount, with Jan ensuring that both organizations regularly communicate, particularly regarding urgent issues that may require immediate attention. This proactive communication can occur through various channels, such as email or phone calls, facilitating a swift resolution of any emerging concerns.

Trust and honesty form the bedrock of the relationship between ABC Ltd and XYZ Ltd. Jan should work towards fostering mutual trust through both formal and informal activities, recognizing the importance of a transparent and cooperative partnership

In terms of performance monitoring, Jan can employ Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to track performance regularly. These metrics should not be viewed as one-off activities but rather as ongoing tools for assessing and ensuring that performance aligns with expectations. Clear communication regarding the consequences of failing to meet these targets, such as the implementation of a Performance Improvement Plan or potential contract cancellation, is essential for maintaining accountability. Regular performance meetings between ABC Ltd and XYZ Ltd provide an opportunity to discuss achievements, setbacks, and any necessary adjustments. Beyond quantitative metrics, surveys and feedback from customers can provide qualitative insights into performance.

Finally, Jan can contribute to the partnership's success by focusing on adding value. This involves going above and beyond the contractual obligations, such as delivering products more efficiently at no additional cost or improving operational efficiencies. Encouraging XYZ Ltd to participate in Value Engineering exercises and engaging in Early Supplier Involvement to shape and define future requirements would be a good example of this. Additionally, providing 'add-ons' or 'extras' outside the contractual framework, such as training for ABC Ltd staff, further enhances the value derived from the partnership.

In conclusion, Jan's role as Contracts Manager extends beyond the initial awarding of a contract- rather her role involves strategic contract and supplier management throughoutthe lifetime of the professional relationship. By ensuring the contract is well-suited for its purpose, fostering a positive relationship with the supplier, monitoring performance effectively, and consistently adding value, Jan contributes to the success of the collaboration between ABC Ltd and XYZ Ltd. This comprehensive approach sets the stage for a mutually beneficial and enduring partnership.

Tutor Notes:

- A case study question like this in the real exam is likely to come with more details. They often come with lots and lots of details to be honest, talking about what XYZ supplies to ABC and the names of the people involved. The case study usually gives you some good clues as to what the examiner will be looking for you to include, so do read them carefully.

- You don’t have to include much ‘theory’ on case study questions – the important thing is to reference Jan as much as possible. BUT you could throw in a cheeky mention of the Kraljic matrix. The approach to managing the contract and supplier would depend on the type of item supplied by XYZ – e.g. if it is a bottleneck item the supplier may need to be handled differently to if it is a routine item. You could also mention KPIs and objectives as being ‘SMART’ - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-Bound

- study guide p.86-90 / p.94 / p.96 -98

- This is essentially two mini essays, so you can do them completely separately if you like.

1) Definition of centralised procurement – when an organisation has a designated procurement function which makes purchases on behalf of other teams. When departments need to make a purchase, they would do this by approaching the procurement department who would purchase the item they need. This is in contrast to devolved procurement where departments can make purchases themselves.

2) Explanation: of 2 forms of hybrid structures- there’s a couple in the study guide you can pick from – consortium, shared services, lead buyer and outsourced. In the old syllabus they used to discuss SCAN – Strategically Controlled Action Network and CLAN = Centre Led Action Network. This has been removed from the new syllabus, but I don’t think it would be wrong to use SCAN and CLAN in this essay if you wanted to. However they are more complicated than the others and if you can talk about other models instead I’d definitely go for that.

Example Essay:

Centralized procurement refers to a procurement strategy where an organization consolidates its purchasing activities into a single, central department or unit. Instead of allowing individual departments or divisions within the organization to independently manage their procurement processes, centralized procurement involves the concentration of these activities under a unified structure.

Key features of centralized procurement include:

1) Single Procurement Authority: In a centralized procurement system, there is a designated procurement authority or department responsible for handling all purchasing decisions. This central entity has the authority to negotiate contracts, select suppliers, and make procurement-related decisions on behalf of the entire organization.

2) Streamlined Processes: Centralized procurement aims to standardize and streamline procurement processes across the organization. This can include the establishment of uniform procurement policies, procedures, and documentation to ensure consistency and efficiency.

3) Economies of Scale: By consolidating purchasing power, centralized procurement allows organizations to leverage economies of scale. Bulk purchases, standardized contracts, and negotiations with suppliers on a larger scale can lead to cost savings and more favourable terms.

4) Improved Coordination and Communication: Centralized procurement enhances coordination and communication within the organization. With a centralized structure, there is better visibility into overall procurement activities, allowing for improved collaboration, information sharing, and strategic planning. Moreover, this centralized control helps manage risks, ensure transparency, and monitor adherence to ethical and legal standards.

5) Consolidated Supplier Relationships: Centralized procurement enables the organization to consolidate its relationships with suppliers. This can lead to stronger partnerships, better negotiation positions, and improved collaboration with a select group of suppliers that meet the organization's needs.

6) Strategic Decision-Making: Centralized procurement allows organizations to make strategic decisions at a higher level. This includes aligning procurement strategies with overall organizational goals, optimizing the supply chain, and contributing to broader business objectives.

An example of centralised procurement would be in a hotel chain with several hotels across the UK. In a centralised procurement function there would be one team responsible for ordering everything for all of the hotels, rather than allowing the individual hotels to buy things themselves. Premier Inn is an example of a company that uses this structure- it allows them to buy stock in bulk and ensures that all hotels have the same equipment so customers expectations are always met.

Centralized procurement is often contrasted with decentralized procurement, where individual departments or business units manage their procurement independently (i.e. each hotel would buy their own supplies). The choice between centralized and decentralized procurement depends on various factors, including the size and structure of the organization, the nature of its operations, and the specific goals it aims to achieve through its procurement processes.

Consortium Procurement Model:

The consortium procurement model is characterized by the collaboration of multiple organizations forming a joint group (the consortium) to engage in collective buying activities. Typically composed of entities from the same industry or sector, these organizations unite their resources, expertise, and purchasing power to pursue shared procurement objectives. The consortium leverages this collective strength to negotiate contracts, conduct bulk purchases, and benefit from economies of scale, resulting in cost savings and increased operational efficiency. The UK University sector is an example of Consortium activities- many universities come together to ‘group buy’ items as this brings about many benefits.

The main benefit of this form of hybrid procurement model is the increased negotiating power and leverage derived from combining the purchasing volumes of participating entities. This often results in more favourable terms, competitive prices (through bulk purchases), and improved conditions with suppliers. Additionally, consortium buying allows organizations to share resources, knowledge, and expertise, fostering a collaborative environment that enhances overall procurement capabilities. By working together, consortium members can collectively address challenges, negotiate strategically, and navigate the procurement landscape more effectively.

However, consortium buying is not without its challenges. A potential disadvantage lies in the complexity of managing a collaborative procurement structure, involving coordinationamong diverse entities. Achieving consensus on procurement strategies, vendor selection, and contract terms may require considerable effort and compromise. Additionally, individual organizational needs and preferences within the consortium may differ, posing challenges in aligning priorities. It is essential to strike a balance between centralized decision-making and accommodating the specific requirements of each consortium member. Furthermore, the success of consortium buying relies heavily on effective communication and trust among participants. Any breakdown in communication or lack of trust could hinder the collaborative process, impacting the overall efficiency and success of the consortium's procurement endeavours.

Overall, while consortium buying offers notable advantages, its effectiveness is contingent on careful management of collaborative dynamics and effective communication strategies.

Shared Services Procurement Model:

In the shared services procurement model, various departments or business units within a single organization converge under a centralized procurement function. Rather than individual units managing their procurement independently, a dedicated shared services centre is established to provide procurement-related services across the organization. This model facilitates streamlined processes, ensures consistency through standardized procedures, and capitalizes on economies of scale.

One key benefit is the potential for cost savings through economies of scale. By centralizing procurement, the organization can negotiate bulk purchases and standardized contracts, leading to better terms and prices. This consolidation of purchasing power enables the organization to optimize its resources and achieve overall cost efficiency. Additionally, centralized procurement allows for streamlined processes, standardized procedures, and better control over procurement activities. It promotes consistency, reduces redundancy, and ensures adherence to organizational policies and compliance requirements.

However, there are also potential disadvantages to centralized procurement. One notable challenge is the potential for reduced flexibility in meeting the unique needs of individual departments or business units within the organization. Centralization may lead to standardized approaches that might not be well-suited for all units, potentially impacting their specific requirements. Furthermore, the centralization of decision-making can result in increased bureaucracy and longer decision-making processes, potentially slowing down procurement activities. Additionally, there may be resistance from decentralized units that are accustomed to managing their procurement independently. Striking a balance between centralized control and accommodating the diverse needs of various units is crucial for the success of centralized procurement.

In conclusion, both the consortium and shared services procurement models represent strategies to enhance efficiency, realize cost savings, and optimize procurement processes. While the consortium model involves collaboration with external entities, the shared services model centralizes procurement functions within a single organization. The choice between these models depends on the unique goals, structure, and requirements of the organizations involved, each offering distinct advantages in the pursuit of effective procurement management.

Tutor Notes:

- This is from LO 3.3 p.161 onwards. There’s quite a bit of information on these hybrid models so there’s many ways it can come up as a question. There are different types of consortium, which I didn’t go into in the above essay because it wasn’t asked for as part ofthe question, but I’d familiarise yourself with this. Also with the pros and cons of each model, and think about when an organisation may choose this type of model.

How to approach the question

Your answer should provide details on 3 of the following:

- Contract Award and Implementation

- Warehouse Logistics

- Contract performance and Improvement

- Supplier Relationship Management

- Asset Management

Because the question is only asking for 3 stages, you’re going to have to go much more into detail for each stage, giving lots of information about why each stage is important and examples. You could consider thinking of an example procurement you have done recently and explaining the stages for that. Or you could take a hypothetical procurement too. Either will get you the same marks. Pick the three that you can write the most about.

Essay Plan

Introduction – explain that sourcing of goods and the role of Procurement doesn’t end once a contract is signed. There is ongoing management and processes which must be carried out to ensure success.

Paragraph 1 – Contract Performance and Improvement

· This is about ensuring contract obligations are fulfilled. Contract administration includes P2P procedures, database management, budgeting / costs monitoring, reporting and dispute resolution

· Procurement’s role may be in managing contract performance through the use of SLAs and / or KPIs. This can be done via reporting, using a Supplier Scorecard and meeting regularly to discuss.

· It’s important KPIs are measured and that there are consequences for failing to meet them. An example of consequences could be using a Performance Improvement Plan.

· Contract Management also includes updating the contract where required – e.g. issuing variations to contract and updating the change control log

· Another important aspect of this is ensuring the costs remain within scope of the budget

· Contract performance can be compared if you have several suppliers delivering the same goods- could use a Factor Rating Method.

· Performance could be measured against several criteria such as on time deliveries, response time of supplier, number of complaints.

Paragraph 2 – Supplier Relationship Management

· There is a difference between managing the contract and managing the supplier relationship. It’s possible to have excellent contract performance and a terrible relationship. However, the two are generally linked- where there is a good relationship, the contract often performs well.

· The supplier management approach depends on where the relationship falls on the relationship spectrum (e.g. transactional or collaborative)

· This involves; maintaining regular contact with the supplier, motivating the supplier, working collaboratively with them (e.g. on performance issues or resolving any disputes)

· Incentivising the supplier leads to collaboration and mutual support

· To assess or rank suppliers you could use a vendor rating method or supplier evaluation forms

· Supplier relationship management may involve investing in the supplier- e.g. through training or technology sharing

Paragraph 3 – Asset Management

· Includes creating a post contract ‘lessons-learned’

· Assessments should be carried out to determine if business requirements have changed, whether the agreement is still required and fit for purpose, what can be learnt from the process and how improvements can be incorporated next time.

· This is the final stage of the Procurement Cycle and takes us back to the start of cycle, which begins again when the item needs to be reprocured

· Whole life costing should be considered at this stage: this is the total cost of ownership over the life of an asset. The concept is also known as life-cycle cost (LCC) or lifetime cost, and is commonly referred to as "cradle to grave" or "womb to tomb" costs.

· Generally used on large purchases such as machinery and vehicles. Full Asset Management may not necessary for direct cost items such as raw materials incorporated into final goods.

· Considerations may include; costs of running the asset, how long it will perform, insurance, maintenance, opportunity costs, disposing of the asset.

· Also consider environmental and social impacts of the procurement.

Conclusion – it is important that procurement are involved at every stage of the cycle, not just in the pre-award stages. Procurement can add value at every stage.

Tutor Notes

- Depending on the examples you choose to use, you could talk about how the type of item procured could impact on the different stages. For example, high risk purchases may require more contract management than low risk purchases, and capital expenditure items such as new machinery may require more attention to the Asset Management stage.

- You could also think about how procurement adds value at each of the stages.

- Study guide p. 79