Juniper JN0-480 Dumps Questions Answers

According to the Juniper documentation1, a routing zone is an L3 domain, the unit of tenancy in multi-tenant networks. You create routing zones for tenants to isolate their IP traffic from one another, thus enabling tenants to re-use IP subnets. In addition to being in its own VRF, each routing zone can be assigned its own DHCP relay server and external system connections. You can create one or more virtual networks within a routing zone, which means a tenant can stretch its L2 applications across multiple racks within its routing zone. For virtual networks with Layer 3 SVI, the SVI is associated with a Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instance for each routing zone isolating the virtual network SVI from other virtual network SVIs in other routing zones. Therefore, the correct answer is D. A routing zone is used to enable the communication between two VNIs within a VRF. A routing zone is not used for L4-L7 inspection, securing routing protocols, or requiring firewalls. Those are not the purposes of a routing zone in Juniper Apstra software. References: Routing Zones

Juniper Apstra role-based access control (RBAC) is a feature that allows you to specify access permissions for different users based on their roles. RBAC servers are remote network servers that authenticate and authorize network access based on roles assigned to individual users within an enterprise1. Juniper Apstra has four predefined user roles: administrator, device_ztp, user, and viewer2. The administrator role is the most powerful role, and it can see all permissions and perform all actions in the Apstra software application. The administrator role can also create, clone, edit, and delete user roles, except for the four predefined user roles, which cannot be modified2. Therefore, the statement that the administrator role can see all permissions is correct.

The following three statements are incorrect in this scenario:

• The viewer role is predefined and can be deleted. This is not true, because the viewer role is one of the four predefined user roles, and it cannot be deleted. The viewer role is the most restricted role, and it can only view the network information and configuration, but not make any changes2.
• The user role can create roles. This is not true, because the user role is one of the four predefined user roles, and it cannot create roles. The user role can perform most of the network configuration and management tasks, but it cannot access the platform settings or the user management features2.
• The administrator role is the only predefined role. This is not true, because there are four predefined user roles, not just one. The other three predefined user roles are device_ztp, user, and viewer2.

References:

• Providers — Apstra 3.3.0 documentation
• User/Role Management (Platform)

In the EVPN-VXLAN data center fabric bridged overlay architecture shown in the exhibit, the servers are connected to Leaf1 and Leaf6 using the same virtual network identifier (VNI). This means that the servers belong to the same Layer 2 domain and can communicate with each other using VXLAN tunnels across the fabric. The underlay network provides the IP connectivity between the leaf and spine devices, and it uses EBGP as the routing protocol. Therefore, the following two statements are correct in this scenario:

• Loopback IPv4 addresses must be advertised into the EBGP underlay from leaf and spine devices. This is because the loopback addresses are used as the source and destination IP addresses for the VXLAN tunnels, and they must be reachable by all the devices in the fabric. The loopback addresses are also used as the router IDs and the BGP peer addresses for the EBGP sessions.
• The underlay EBGP peering’s must be established between leaf and spine devices. This is because the EBGP sessions are used to exchange the underlay routing information and the EVPN routes for the overlay network. The EBGPsessions are established using the loopback addresses of the devices, and they follow a spine-and-leaf topology, where each leaf device peers with all the spine devices, and each spine device peers with all the leaf devices.

The following two statements are incorrect in this scenario:

• The underlay must use IRB interfaces. This is not true, because the underlay network does not provide any Layer 3 gateway functionality for the overlay network. The IRB interfaces are used to provide inter-VXLAN routing within the fabric, which is not the case in the bridged overlay architecture. The IRB interfaces are used in the edge-routed bridging (ERB) or the centrally-routed bridging (CRB) architectures, which are different from the bridged overlay architecture.
• The underlay must be provisioned with PIMv2. This is not true, because the underlay network does not use multicast for the VXLAN tunnels. The VXLAN tunnels are established using EVPN, which uses BGP to distribute the MAC and IP addresses of the end hosts and the VTEP information of the devices. EVPN eliminates the need for multicast in the underlay network, and it provides optimal forwarding and fast convergence for the overlay network.

References:

• Exploring EVPN-VXLAN Overlay Architectures – Bridged Overlay
• EVPN LAGs in EVPN-VXLAN Reference Architectures
• EVPN-VXLAN Configuration Guide