CTFL-Foundation ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Questions and Answers

An incident report typically includes the version(s) of the software under test, expected results and actual results, and precise steps to reproduce the problem. However, the test execution schedule is not a standard part of an incident report. It is more relevant to test planning and management documents rather than incident reporting​​.

Common metrics used for monitoring test preparation and execution typically include quantitative measures such as the number of test cases passed and failed, the percentage of planned test cases designed, and the percentage of tasks completed in test environment preparation. These metrics provide insights into the progress and effectiveness of the testing process. However, the number of test plan review comments is not a typical metric for this purpose, as it does not directly measure the progress or quality of test execution​​.

Decision coverage is a testing metric used to ensure that all possible paths (decisions) in the code have been executed at least once. It is not used to verify the correctness of module calls, which ismore related to integration testing or control flow testing. Options A, B, and D describe valid uses of decision coverage, ensuring that decisions are exercised in programs, business processes, and measuring the extent of coverage by a test suite​​ .

To meet the test plan requirements and logical dependencies, the test schedule should start with re-tests (those that have previously failed), followed by the highest priority tests. Additionally, tests should be scheduled to create necessary test data for subsequent tests. In this case, teste(log in as admin user and create a standard user) must be done first as it is necessary to perform all other actions. Following this, testa(log in as standard user and create customer account) creates the standard user needed for subsequent actions. Then, the highest priority testd(order twoitems or more), which has failed before, should be executed next, followed by testc(create invoice for order), and finally testb(order one item)​​.

The level of risk is determined by evaluating both the impact and the likelihood of an adverse event occurring. This approach ensures that both the severity of potential consequences and the probability of the event are considered. The impact assesses how serious the consequences would be if the event happened, while the likelihood evaluates how probable it is that the event will occur. This combination provides a comprehensive measure of risk, helping organizations prioritize their risk management efforts effectively​​.

A dynamic analysis tool would have been the most effective at detecting a defect where a code component fails to release memory after use. These tools analyze the behavior of the software while it is running, allowing them to identify issues like memory leaks, which occur when memory is not properly freed. Dynamic analysis tools can monitor the allocation and deallocation of memory in real-time, helping to pinpoint the exact location and cause of the memory leak before the software is deployed​​ .

Measurement of code coverage is important because it helps ensure that all code is exercised by tests. This does not guarantee that there are no coding errors or that all requirements are covered, but it helps identify untested parts of the code, allowing for better test coverage and more robust testing processes​​.

During the test planning stage, it is important to assign resources for the planned activities. This ensures that the necessary personnel, equipment, and time are allocated to execute the test plan effectively. Analyzing the test basis, designing test environments, and writing a test execution schedule are activities that come after the initial planning and resource allocation​​.

When a developer makes a mistake that introduces a fault in the code, and this fault is not detected during testing, it becomes a latent defect. The definite consequence is that if this defect is executed under specific conditions, it may cause the system to fail. The actual failure occurs only when the defect is triggered during the system's operation. This emphasizes the importance of thorough testing to catch such defects before the software is released​​.

Static analysis tools are designed to analyze code without executing it. They are highly effective at identifying issues such as syntax errors, variable declaration, and usage problems. Options A, B, and D are types of defects that static analysis tools can typically detect because they relate to the code structure and syntax. However, Option C refers to a variable having the wrong numeric value passed into it, which is more of a logical error that typically requires dynamic testing to identify. Static analysis tools cannot understand the correct logical flow or expected values in the code, thus making Option C the correct answer​​ .

Maintenance testing is typically triggered by changes to the operational system, such as data migration, system modification, or system retirement. These triggers require testing to ensure that the changes do not negatively impact the existing functionality. However, the introduction of a test management tool does not directly affect the operational system and is not considered a trigger for maintenance testing​​.

For a system with complex business rules and many branches, decision testing (a white-box technique) is appropriate because it ensures that each decision point (branch) in the code is tested. Equivalence partitioning (a black-box technique) complements this by ensuring that all functional areas (based ondifferent inputs) are adequately tested. This combination provides thorough coverage of both the internal logic and the functional requirements of the system​​.

According to the decision table:

For TC1, since Paul is not a full member but is a Loyalty Card holder and requests 18 holes with a buggy/cart, the applicable action is £18 Green Fees plus £5 for buggy/cart, totaling £23.

For TC2, since Cheryl is not a full member, does not have a Loyalty Card, and requests 9 holes with a buggy/cart, the applicable action is £16 Green Fees with no buggy allowed​​.

Equivalence partitioning is a black-box test design technique that divides input data into partitions that are expected to be treated similarly by the system. In this case, 0600 falls into the peak-time tariff, 1000 is at the boundary of peak-time but still included in it, and 1200 falls into the off-peak tariff. This ensures that each input is from a different equivalence partition, testing different functional areas of the system​​.

An independent test function in an organization helps improve defect finding during reviews and testing by providing an unbiased perspective on the software. Independent testers are not influenced by the development team’s constraints and can evaluate the software more objectively. This leads to the identification of defects that might be overlooked by developers who are too close to their own code. Independent testing enhances the quality and reliability of the software by bringing fresh insights and ensuring thorough testing​​.

In the provided state table, an invalid transition is represented by an empty cell. According to the table, Event E from State S4 is an invalid transition as the cell for this combination is empty. This indicates that the transition from State S4 on Event E is not defined​​.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Providing support for the test team using the tool is crucial for successful deployment. This includes training the test team on how to effectively use the tool, offering ongoing support to address any issues, and integrating the tool into existing processes. By ensuring that the team is well-equipped and confident in using the tool, the organization can maximize the benefits of the tool and improve overall testing efficiency​​.

Testing is primarily aimed at detecting defects, verifying the functionality, and providing information to stakeholders for decision-making. While investigating defects is part of the testing process, fixing defects is not typically considered an objective of testing; it falls under the development activities. The main objectives of testing include preventing defects (through early testing activities), gaining confidence in the system, and providing valuable information to stakeholders​​.

The amount of testing effort is highly influenced by the predicted number of defects and the subsequent amount of rework required. If a high number of defects are expected, more effort will be needed to identify, document, and retest the defects after they are fixed. This impacts the overall testing workload significantly compared to other factors such as the ratio of developers to testers, which affects team dynamics but not the core testing effort​​.

Boundary value analysis involves testing at the boundaries between partitions. For the Frequency input, valid boundaries are 1 and 5, while invalid boundaries are 0 and 6. For the Duration input, valid boundaries are 1 and 60 minutes, while invalid boundaries are 0 and 61 minutes. Therefore, Option C includes the correct set of valid and invalid boundary values for both inputs​​.

A Test Procedure Specification is a document that outlines the precise steps required to execute a test. It includes detailed instructions on the setup, execution, and teardown of the test environment, as well as the specific actions to be performed and the expected results. This document ensures that tests are conducted consistently and repeatably​​.

Structural testing, also known as white-box testing, focuses on the internal structure of the software. It includes testing all paths, achieving decision coverage, and ensuring that all branches within the component calls are tested. Ensuring that users can navigate to all fields on the screen, however, is a form of functional testing, which focuses on the behavior and usability of the application from the user's perspective, rather than its internal structure​​.

The correct logical order for the test cases ensures a smooth and realistic flow through the system functionalities. The sequence should start with logging into the system (Test Case 3), searching for available flights (Test Case 1), selecting an available flight (Test Case 4), viewing the selected item in My Flights (Test Case 2), confirming details and booking the flight in My Flights (Test Case 6), and finally printing the confirmation receipt and exiting (Test Case 5)​​ .

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Good testing practice involves early involvement of testers in the software development process. This helps identify defects early and provides better understanding and clarification of requirements. Involving testers in reviewing requirements or user stories as soon as drafts are available allows for early detection of defects, which is more cost-effective and efficient. This practice is beneficial regardless of the software lifecycle model used​​ .

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

According to the decision table, Test Case 1 is valid because an employee who is not a car or motorcycle driver cannot claim expenses, as shown in Rule 1. Test Case 3 is valid because a motorcycle driver can claim expenses, as indicated in Rule 2, with expenses claim band A. However, Test Case 2 is invalid because, according to Rule 5, a car driver with a diesel engine greater than 1600cc cannot claim expenses. The expected result should be that the expense claim is not allowed, not band C​​.

The fundamental test process consists of several sequential steps: planning and control, analysis, design, implementation, execution, evaluation of exit criteria and reporting, and test closure. This comprehensive process ensures that testing is methodical and covers all necessary aspects from preparation to conclusion.

White box testing techniques, also known as structure-based techniques, focus on the internal structure of the software. Decision testing (C) is a white box technique that involves creating test cases to execute specific decision points in the code, such as conditional statements. This ensures that all possible paths through the code are tested, helping to identify defects related to the control flow of the application. Other techniques listed, such as use case testing and state transition testing, are black box techniques that focus on the software's functionality from the user's perspective​​.

Valid test objectives include finding defects (i), gaining confidence about the level of quality and providing information (ii), and preventing defects (iii). Debugging the code (iv) is not a valid test objective as it is a part of the development process rather than the testing process.

Static techniques involve the examination and evaluation of software products without executing them. According to the ISTQB syllabus, these techniques include both manual and automated reviews and analyses of code and project documentation. This helps identify defects early in the development process, improving the overall quality and reducing the cost of fixing defects later in the lifecycle​​.

Effective ways to improve communication and relationships between testers and other team members include communicating factual information in a constructive way (a) and trying to understand how the other person feels and why they react the way they do (b). These approaches foster a collaborative and empathetic environment, reducing friction and enhancing teamwork.

In state transition testing, test cases are designed to execute specific sequences of state transitions. Referring to the provided state transition diagram:

For test case (i) X-Z-V-W, the corresponding state transitions are S1 (X) → S2, S2 (Z) → S3, S3 (V) → S4, and S4 (W) → S2. Therefore, the sequence of state transitions is S1 – S2 – S3 – S4 – S2.

For test case (ii) W-Y-U-U, the corresponding state transitions are S4 (W) → S2, S2 (Y) → S4, S4 (U) → S4, and S4 (U) → S4. Therefore, the sequence of state transitions is S4 – S2 – S4 – S4 – S4.

This ensures that the transitions accurately reflect the states and paths described in the test cases.

For user acceptance testing (UAT) of the first release of a new software product aimed at a general market and built using Agile methods, appropriate test objectives would be to ensure the product works as expected (c) and to assess the overall quality of the product (d). These objectives focus on validating that the software meets user needs and overall quality standards.

Experience-based test design techniques rely on the tester's skill, intuition, and experience to derive test cases. Techniques like error guessing and exploratory testing fall under this category. These methods do not depend on formal specifications but rather on the tester's understanding of the system and potential areas where defects might exist.

Testing support tools are typically used to automate activities that are resource-intensive when done manually, repetitive tasks, and repetitive inspections. However, they are not usually designed to automate activities that cannot be executed manually at all, as such activities may require complex and sophisticated human intervention or decision-making.

A technical review is a formal type of review that focuses on discussing, making decisions, evaluating alternatives, finding defects, solving technical problems, and checking conformance to specifications, plans, regulations, and standards. It is typically conducted by a team of experts and aims to ensure the technical quality of the product.

Boundary Value Analysis (BVA) involves testing at the boundaries between partitions. For the given tax calculation system, the boundaries include $4,000 (tax-free), $5,500 (next bracket start), and $33,500 (higher bracket start). Testing with $5,000 is valid because it is a boundary value between the tax-free and the 10% tax bracket.

Experience-based and intuition-based testing techniques, such as error guessing and exploratory testing, can be valuable in uncovering defects that formal techniques might miss. These approaches leverage the tester's knowledge, intuition, and experience, providing a complementary layer to more structured and formal testing techniques.

Component testing, also known as unit testing, involves testing individual components of the software separately. This type of testing focuses on the functionality of a specific section of the code. To facilitate this process, stubs and drivers are often used. Stubs are dummy modules that simulate the behavior of lower-level modules that are not yet integrated. Drivers are used to simulate higher-level modules that control the component being tested.

The selection of a software development model should be based on the specific characteristics of the product and project. Factors such as project size, complexity, requirements stability, and team expertise influence the choice of the most suitable development model. The ISTQB syllabus explains that there is no one-size-fits-all approach, and the decision should be tailored to the context and needs of the project​​.

A valid objective of testing is to prevent defects. While correcting defects and locating defects in the code are part of the testing process, the primary goal is often to prevent defects by identifying issues early in the development cycle and improving the overall quality of the software. Ensuring no defects are present is an unrealistic objective, as testing can demonstrate the presence of defects but not their absence.

Experience-based techniques rely on the testers' knowledge, skills, and experience, as well as insights from developers and users, to design test cases. These techniques do not depend on formal models or the internal structure of the software but rather on practical experience and understanding of how the software is likely to be used and where defects are likely to be found​​.

Test planning should be a continuous activity throughout the software development lifecycle. This ensures that the test plans remain relevant and effective, adapting to any changes in the project scope, requirements, or timelines.

For a safety-critical system, it is essential to ensure that regression tests are run and passed following defect corrections at all test levels. Additionally, tracking incidents raised and closed at all levels of testing helps ensure that all defects are addressed and the system meets safety standards. These metrics provide a comprehensive view of both the completeness of testing and the effectiveness of defect resolution.

Use-case testing involves scenarios based on the use cases of a system. In a use-case diagram, an actor represents a type of user (i). A use-case describes interactions between actors and the system (iii). Test cases can be based on use-case scenarios (v), and use-case testing often identifies gaps not found by testing individual components (vi). However, an actor is not always a human user (iv), and use-cases are not the most common test basis for unit testing (ii).

To run all the tests successfully, one must follow the logical sequence dictated by the dependencies between the actions. The process should start with creating the account (e) and setting it up (i), then creating the account user (f) and making any amendments (g). Only after these steps can an invoice be created (a) and processed (c), followed by amending (b) and deleting (d) the invoice. Finally, the sequence concludes with managing the account user and the account itself (h, j). This logical order ensures all dependencies are respected and all functionalities are tested​​.

A test condition is defined as an item or event of a component or system that can be verified by one or more test cases. This means that a test condition is something that can be tested to determine if it meets the expected behavior. It forms the basis for creating test cases that will verify the condition's correctness​​.

For a review process to be successful, several factors must be in place. According to the ISTQB syllabus, successful reviews generally have clearly defined objectives (a), involve the right people who understand the objectives of the review (c), and place an emphasis on learning and process improvement (d). These elements ensure that the review is focused, effective, and contributes to the overall improvement of the software development process​​.

According to the IEEE 829 Standard for Software Test Documentation, an incident report should include the identification of configuration items of the software or system (i), the software or system lifecycle process in which the incident was observed (ii), a description of the anomaly to enable reproduction of the incident (iii), and the classification of the cause of the incident formetrics and reporting purposes (v). The number of occurrences of the incident is not typically included.

Exit criteria are the conditions that must be met to conclude a particular phase of testing. These criteria include acceptance criteria, completion criteria, and pass/fail criteria. They help ensure that the testing process is thorough and that the system meets the required standards before moving on to the next phase.

The application failed due to a defect in the purchase identification module. This defect could have been caused by a programmer mistake or an error in the specification. The incorrect counting of purchase attempts indicates a flaw in the logic or implementation of the module responsible for identifying successful purchases.

Decision table testing is a black-box test design technique used to test system requirements and to ensure that different combinations of inputs result in appropriate outputs. It is especially useful for testing complex business logic and rules where various combinations of conditions need to be verified.

Security testing falls under functional testing. It involves verifying that the system protects data and maintains functionality as intended, even in the presence of malicious inputs or attacks. Security testing is essential to ensure that the system meets its security requirements and is capable of resisting unauthorized access or other security breaches. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 2.4.3​​.

Requirements management tools (ii) have traceability because they enable test conditions and subsequently test scripts and defects to be traced back to requirements. Configuration management tools (iii) also need to trace the appropriate version of a test script to the release or version of a system or module.

Performance monitoring tools (i) and static analysis tools (iv) are designed for specific objectives. Neither of these tools particularly need traceability functions.

Maintenance testing is performed on an existing operational system that has undergone planned enhancements, corrections, or other modifications. The goal is to ensure that the changes have been implemented correctly and that the system continues to function as intended. This type of testing is not typically used for defect correction during development, user acceptance testing complaints, or the integration of functions in new system development​​.

Requirements management tools (option (D)) often have interfaces with test management tools. In some cases they will be sold as a package or in other cases a test management tool may have its own requirements module. The use of such interfaces or integrated packages aids traceability from requirements through to test scripts and defects.

Performance management tools (option (A)), test data preparation tools (option (B)) and static analysis tools (option (C)) are unlikely to have an interface or be integrated with a test management tool. They serve different purposes and therefore there is little need for such interfaces.

The impossibility of complete testing has several important consequences. It means we can never be certain that the program is entirely bug-free (A). There is no definite stopping point for testing, which can make it easier for some managers to justify minimal testing (B). Additionally, there is no simple answer for which testing tasks should always be required, as each task takes time that could be allocated to other critical activities (C). Therefore, all these consequences (D) are valid and important considerations in software testing. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 2.2​​.

(i) Executing component integration tests is usually done by developers. Developers are usually responsible for unit and component integration testing. Independent testing usually follows at system and acceptance test levels.

(ii) Static analysis is usually done by developers because: it requires an understanding of the code and therefore the person doing this needs skills in the programming language; and it can be done as soon as the code is written. Therefore it is quick and effective for the developer to do it. The risk of a lack of test independence can be mitigated by performing independent system and acceptance testing.

(iii) Setting up the test environment is an activity typically performed by a tester. It may require support from developers and staff from other departments and on some occasions environmentscould be set up by developers. However, it is a task that could be done by a tester rather than a developer.

(iv) Deciding how much testing should be automated is typically a decision made by the test leader, who will consult other staff in the decision-making process. Developers may be involved and their skills may be required to automate some tests. However, the decision on how much to automate should not be made by developers.

Maintenance testing refers to the testing that is conducted on a software system that has been changed, either through corrections, enhancements, or other modifications. Its main purpose is to ensure that the changes have been implemented correctly and that the system as a whole continues to function as intended. This type of testing is crucial after a system has been released and needs to be updated or fixed. Maintenance testing ensures that the new changes do not adversely affect the existing functionality of the system​​.REREE33

This option has someone nearer to the written code in each statement. All other options are not in this order.

Tester independence refers to the degree to which the tester is separate from the development team to avoid bias and increase the objectivity of the tests. The highest level of independence is achieved when tests are designed by someone from an entirely different company, followed by someone from a different department within the same company, and then by another member of the development team. The lowest level of independence is when tests are designed by the author of the code being tested.

A disadvantage of independent testing is that developers might lose a sense of responsibility for the quality of their work. When developers rely too much on independent testers to find defects, they may become less diligent in their own testing and quality assurance efforts. The ISTQB CTFL Syllabus points out that while independent testing can provide an unbiased perspective and identify defects that might be missed by developers, it can also lead to potential downsides such as diminished developer accountability​​.

A risk-based approach to testing provides information on the types of test techniques to be employed. This approach prioritizes the testing of features and functions based on their risk of failure and their impact on the organization. By identifying the areas of highest risk, test managers can allocate resources and select test techniques that are most likely to uncover defects in these critical areas. This approach ensures that testing efforts are focused where they are most needed. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 5.2 .QUESTION NO: 85

When assembling a test team to work on an enhancement to an existing system, which of the following has the highest level of test independence?

A. A business analyst who wrote the original requirements for the system.

B. A permanent programmer who reviewed some of the new code, but has not written any of it.

C. A permanent tester who found most defects in the original system.

D. A contract tester who has never worked for the organization before.

Answer: D

In this scenario, the contract tester who has never worked for the organization before has the highest level of test independence. The three others are less independent as they are likely to make assumptions based on their previous knowledge of the requirements, code and general functionality of the original system.

Note that independence does not necessarily equate to most useful. In practice most test or project managers would recruit a permanent tester who has worked on the original system in preference to a contract tester with no knowledge of the system. However, when assembling a team it would be useful to have staff with varying levels of test independence and system knowledge.

If the project isn't big enough to justify extensive testing, the best approach is to use risk-based analysis. This method prioritizes testing efforts based on the risk of failure and the impact of defects. It helps in identifying critical areas that need more focus, thus optimizing the testing process by concentrating on high-risk components and functionalities​​.

The tasks of a tester typically include preparing and acquiring test data, implementing tests on all levels, executing and logging the tests, and creating test specifications. Interaction with the testtool vendor is generally not a primary task for testers but rather for test managers or tool specialists. The ISTQB CTFL Syllabus outlines these roles and responsibilities, emphasizing the technical tasks testers perform to ensure thorough testing and documentation​​.

A tool that supports traceability, recording of incidents, or scheduling of tests is called a test management tool. These tools help in planning, managing, and tracking the testing process, providing features for managing test cases, tracking defects, and maintaining traceability between test artifacts​​.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Code Coverage is a measure used to describe the degree to which the source code of a program is tested by a particular test suite. It helps in determining the effectiveness of testing by indicating the parts of the code that have been exercised by the tests and those that have not. It is an important metric for evaluating test coverage and identifying areas that may require additional testing. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 4.3.2​​.

Re-testing and regression testing are essential concepts in software testing, each serving a different purpose. According to the ISTQB CTFL Syllabus, version 4.0, the difference between these two types of testing is highlighted as follows:

Re-testing(also known as confirmation testing) involves executing the same tests again on the same version of the software after defects have been fixed. The primary goal is to confirm that the original defects have been successfully removed and that the software behaves as expected.

Regression testing, on the other hand, is performed to ensure that recent code changes have not adversely affected the existing functionalities of the software. This testing aims to detect any unexpected side effects introduced by the new changes.

The syllabus states: "Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects"​​. This explanation clarifies that while re-testing focuses on verifying specific defect fixes, regression testing ensures the overall stability and integrity of the software after changes.

Failures in software can be caused by various reasons, including testing faults, software faults, design faults, environment faults, and documentation faults. The ISTQB CTFL syllabus v4.0 discusses that these types of issues can all contribute to failures in software, highlighting the importance of thorough testing and review processes throughout the software development lifecycle​​.

A driver is a piece of code that calls a function or module to be tested and passes it the necessary test data. It is commonly used in bottom-up integration testing to simulate the higher-level modules thatinvoke the function being tested. Stubs, on the other hand, are used to simulate lower-level modules. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 4.3.1​​.

Fault masking occurs when one defect prevents the detection of another defect. In other words, an error condition hides another error condition, making it more difficult to identify and correct all defects. This can happen in various scenarios, such as when a certain path of code execution is blocked by an existing error, preventing other potential errors from being executed and detected. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 1.5.5​​.

A test completion criterion is used to determine when testing activities can be concluded. According to the ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus v4.0, setting test completion criteria helps in defining when the testing objectives have been achieved, which includes reaching a defined coverage level, running out of time or budget, or meeting the expected level of risk acceptance. These criteria are essential for ensuring that the testing process is concluded appropriately and resources are utilized effectively.

Complete testing is best defined as having tested every statement, branch, and combination of branches in the program. This definition aligns with achieving thorough code coverage, ensuring that all parts of the code have been exercised by tests. However, it is important to note that complete testing in a practical sense is rarely achievable, as it assumes exhaustive testing of all possible scenarios. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 4.3.2​​.

Iterative development involves users in the testing throughout the development process. This approach allows for continuous feedback from users, ensuring that the evolving system meets user requirements and expectations. Unlike the traditional waterfall model, iterative development accommodates changes and improvements based on user feedback, making it suitable for dynamic environments like website development. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 2.1.3​​.

Tests are prioritized to ensure that the most critical and risk-prone areas are tested first, thereby achieving the best possible coverage within the available time frame. This approach helps manage resources effectively and ensures that significant defects are found early. As per the ISTQB CTFL Syllabus, prioritization helps in maximizing the effectiveness of testing by focusing on the most important aspects and making the best use of limited time and resources​​.

The typical order of testing phases starts with unit testing, where individual components are tested in isolation. This is followed by system testing, where the integrated system is tested as a whole. Acceptance testing is then conducted to ensure the system meets the business requirements and is ready for deployment. Finally, maintenance testing is performed after the system is in production to ensure it continues to function correctly and to address any issues that arise.

Test independence is beneficial because it helps to avoid author bias, ensuring that the tests are designed and executed objectively. When testers who are not involved in the development of the code test it, they bring a fresh perspective and are more likely to identify defects that the developers might have overlooked due to familiarity with their own work. This principle is supported by the ISTQB CTFL Syllabus, which highlights that independence can enhance the effectiveness of testing by eliminating the preconceived notions and biases of those who wrote the code​​.

Retesting, also known as confirmation testing, involves executing a previously failed test case after the defect has been fixed. The objective is to ensure that the original defect has been successfully removed. This type of testing is critical in verifying that the defect fixes are effective and that the software now operates as expected under the same conditions that previously caused the failure.

The V-model enables test planning to start as early as possible. This model is an extension of the waterfall model and emphasizes the importance of early test planning and development of test cases, which corresponds to the development stages. By planning tests early, the V-model ensures that testing is integrated into every phase of the software development lifecycle. Reference: ISTQB CTFL Syllabus V4.0, Section 2.1.2​​.

Assessing organizational maturity (i) is very important when deciding whether to introduce a test tool, as implementing a tool in an immature test organization with poor processes is unlikely to produce any benefits.

A quick return on the initial investment (ii) in a test tool is rare.

Having a requirement that a tool should be easy to use for untrained and unskilled testers (iii) is generally a false hope. This is comparable with expecting someone who has never driven a car to be able to drive safely and effectively.

Agreeing requirements before evaluating tools (iv) is essential. Not to do so would be comparable with building and testing a system without requirements.

In conclusion, (i) and (iv) are good principles to follow when introducing a tool and (ii) and (iii) are not.