APICS CPIM-Part-2 Dumps Questions Answers

ABC classification is an inventory categorization technique that divides items into three classes based on their usage value, which is the product of the number of units sold and the cost per unit. Class A items have the highest usage value and account for a large proportion of the total inventory value, but a small percentage of the number of items. Class B items have a moderate usage value and account for a moderate proportion of the total inventory value and the number of items. Class C items have the lowest usage value and account for a small proportion of the total inventory value, but a large percentage of the number of items1.

An advantage of applying ABC classification to a firm’s replenishment items is that it allows planners to focus on critical products. Replenishment items are items that are regularly ordered or produced to maintain a certain level of inventory. By using ABC classification, planners can prioritize the replenishment of class A items, which have the highest impact on the firm’s profitability and customer satisfaction. Planners can also apply different inventory management techniques and policies for each class of items, such as more frequent reviews, tighter controls, lower safety stocks, and higher service levels for class A items, and less frequent reviews, simpler controls, higher safetystocks, and lower service levels for class C items234. This way, ABC classification can help planners optimize the replenishment process and reduce costs, waste, and stockouts.

The other options are not advantages of applying ABC classification to a firm’s replenishment items, because they are either irrelevant or incorrect. ABC classification does not distinguish independent demand from dependent demand, which are two types of demand that depend on whether the item is sold to customers or used as a component in another item5. ABC classification does not provide better order quantities than the economic order quantity (EOQ), which is a formula that calculates the optimal order quantity that minimizes the total inventory costs6. ABC classification does not allow the firm to utilize time-phased order point (TPOP), which is a method that determines when to place an order based on the projected inventory position and the lead time7.

To successfully empower individuals to drive change, an organization should ensure everyone can clearly articulate the business’s vision and strategy. According to various sources, such as Forbes, Mercuri Urval, and LSA Global, one of the key factors for effective change leadership is to communicate a powerful and compelling change vision that inspires and motivates employees to support the change. A change vision is a statement that describes the desired future state of the organization after the change is implemented, and how it aligns with the overall business vision and strategy1. A clear and consistent change vision can help employees understand the purpose and benefits of the change, as well as their roles and responsibilities in the change process2. A change vision can also help create a sense of urgency, direction, and alignment among employees, as well as foster a culture of empowerment and participation3.

The other options are not sufficient or necessary to successfully empower individuals to drive change. Conducting thorough training programs for all levels of employees is important, but not enough to empower them to drive change. Training can help employees acquire the skills and knowledge needed to perform their tasks in the new situation, but it does not necessarily influence their attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors toward the change1. Aligning performance appraisals with the business’s vision is also helpful, but not essential to empower individuals to drive change. Performance appraisals can provide feedback, recognition, and incentives for employees who demonstrate the desired behaviors and outcomes related to the change, but they do not address the underlying motivations, emotions, or barriers that may affect employees’ willingness or ability to change4. Establishing and tracking broad change metrics on a quarterly basis is also useful, but not critical to empower individuals to drive change. Change metrics can help measure the progress and impact of the change initiatives, but they do not necessarily engage or involve employees in the change process or give them a sense of ownership or autonomy over the change5.

References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Domain 8: Manage Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology, Section 8.2: Continuous Improvement Concepts and Tools, p. 61-62; 5 Ways To Empower And Engage Employees To Lead Change - Forbes; How to successfully drive change in your organisation - Mercuri Urval; Empower Employees to Effect Change - 4 Ways | LSA Global; Empowering Teams to Drive Change Sustainably; Change Management Metrics: How To Measure Your Change Management Project.

According to the CPIM Exam Content Manual, a make-or-buy decision is a strategic decision that involves choosing between manufacturing a product or service internally or purchasing it from an external supplier1. A make-or-buy decision is based on a cost-benefit analysis that considers various factors, such as quality, cost, capacity, lead time, technology, and competitive advantage2.

Some of the potential reasons to make instead of buy a product may include:

• Maintain quality: Making a product internally may allow the firm to control and ensure the quality standards of the product, which may affect customer satisfaction and loyalty. Buyinga product from an external supplier may involve quality risks or uncertainties, especially if the supplier is located in a different country or has different quality systems3.
• Reduce cost: Making a product internally may reduce the total cost of ownership of the product, which includes not only the purchase price, but also the costs of transportation, inventory, inspection, warranty, and maintenance. Buying a product from an external supplier may incur higher total costs due to these factors.
• Keep confidential processes within the firm: Making a product internally may protect the firm’s proprietary or confidential processes that give it a competitive edge in the market. Buying a product from an external supplier may expose the firm’s processes to potential imitation or leakage.

Therefore, the correct answer is C. maintain quality, reduce cost, and keep confidential processes within the firm.

References:

• CPIM Exam Content Manual
• Make-or-Buy Decision Explained: How to Make Outsourcing Decisions
• Make or Buy Decision - What Is It, Examples, Factors, Advantages
• Make-or-Buy Decision - Overview, How It Works, Triggers
• Make or Buy Decision - Definition & Examples | Marketing Tutor