CESP Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP) Questions and Answers

 Supported employment services are a personalized model for supporting people with significant disabilities to secure and retain paid employment in integrated communitysettings12. The model uses a partnership strategy to enable people with disabilities to achieve sustainable long-term employment and businesses to employ valuable workers12. Supported employment services are based on the core values and principles of inclusion, empowerment, choice, respect, dignity, and individualization12.

Among the four options, only C is consistent with these values and principles, and the most appropriate way to proceed with the individual. By meeting with him to discuss his employment interests, and engaging him in the job development process, the supported employment professional can demonstrate respect for his preferences, goals, and abilities, and empower him to take an active role in his own employment journey12. This can also help to build rapport, trust, and motivation, and address anybarriers or challenges that may have affected his previous engagement and follow through34.

Option A is not appropriate, as it implies that the individual is not ready for services, and needs to undergo a prevocational program to assess his skills and abilities. This goes against the supported employment principle of zero exclusion, which states that anyone who wants to work can work, regardless of their level of disability or support needs12. Prevocational programs are often segregated, time-limited, and do not lead to competitive employment outcomes56. Option B is also not appropriate, as it implies that the individual is not committed or responsible, and needs to prove himself before receiving services. This goes against the supported employment principle of empowerment, which states that the individual should be treated as an equal partner, and not as a passive recipient of services12. Setting up conditions may also create a power imbalance, and discourage the individual from engaging in the process78. Option D is also not appropriate, as it implies that the individual is not welcome or valued by the current program or provider, and needs to start over with a new one. This goes against the supported employment principle of inclusion, which states that theindividual should be supported to participate fully in the community, and not be isolated or excluded12. Referring him to another program or provider may also disrupt the continuity of services, and affect the quality of the relationship and the outcomes910.

References:

• 1: What Is Supported Employment? | British Association for Supported Employment
• 2: Certified Employment Support Professional - apse.org
• 3: Supported Employment Services | DSHS
• 4: What Is Supported Employment? - Integrity, Inc.
• 5: The Case Against Prevocational Services - ThinkWork
• 6: Prevocational Services: A Review of the Literature - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
• 7: Motivational Interviewing in Supported Employment - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
• 8: Motivational Interviewing in Employment Services - Journal of Rehabilitation
• 9: The Importance of Continuity in Employment Services - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
• 10: The Impact of Staff Turnover on Employment Services - Journal of Rehabilitation Administration

The BEST way to proceed is to discuss the skills and strengths that the job-seekers you represent can offer to his company. This would help the employer to see the value and potential of hiring people with disabilities, and how they can contribute to his business goals and needs. It would also demonstrate your professionalism and respect for the employer, and create a positive impression of your organization. The other options are not as effective or appropriate because:

• A. Telling him how eager the job-seekers you represent are to work, and how much it would mean for many of them to have a job, would not address the employer’s concern about the cost of hiring people with special needs. It would also imply that the job-seekers are desperate or needy, and not qualified or competent for the job.
• B. Telling him that it is illegal to discriminate on the basis of a disability would not persuade the employer to hire people with disabilities, but rather make him defensive or hostile. It would also damage the relationship and trust between you and the employer, and possibly harm the reputation of your organization.
• D. Avoiding wasting time with this employer because he is resistant to hiring individuals with a disability would miss an opportunity to educate and inform the employer about the benefits and advantages of hiring people with disabilities. It would also limit the options and choices for the job-seekers you represent, and prevent them from accessing potential employment opportunities. References:
• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 12, Domain 3: Community Research and Job Development, Task 3.2: Develop and maintain relationships with employers, Knowledge of 3.2.1: Effective marketing strategies and techniques
• CESP- ASPE Flashcards, card 68, Marketing, Definition: The process of identifying and communicating the benefits of hiring individuals with disabilities to potential employers.

 The least effective question to ask is “How do you feel about employing people with disabilities?” This is because this question is not relevant to the purpose of an informational interview, which is to gather information about the business, the industry, the job requirements, and the employer’s needs1. Asking this question may also create a negative impression of the job developer and the job seeker, as it may imply that the job seeker is not qualified or capable of performing the job, or that the employer has a bias or prejudice against people with disabilities2. Furthermore, this question may violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits employers from asking disability-related questions before making a job offer3.

References:

• 1: Informational Interviewing: A Guide for Employment Support Professionals1
• 2: Job Development Dos and Don’ts2
• 3: Pre-Employment Inquiries and the ADA3

One of the best ways to become more familiar with a job seeker’s daily routine and environment is to spend time with the individual in their natural settings, such as their home, community, or school1. This can help the employment support professional to observe the job seeker’s skills, interests, preferences, and needs, as well as to identify potential barriers and supports for employment2. Reading the Vocational Evaluation Report, checking their school records, or asking their counselor may provide some useful information, but they are not as effective as direct observation and interaction with the job seeker3. References: 1: CESP Content Outline -CESP 2: Certified Employment Support Professional 3: Domain Application of Core Values and Principles to Practice 1

Collecting data for a task analysis requires observation. Task analysis is the method of learning through observation. A person closely observes another person to understand how they complete tasks. They then divide that larger task into subtasks, making it more manageable1. Observation is the primary way of collecting data for a task analysis, as it allows the analyst to see the actual steps, actions, and skills involved in performing a task. Instruction, fading, and training are not methods of collecting data, but rather methods of providing support or intervention to the person performing the task. References:

• What Is Task Analysis? Definition, How To and Examples

According to the CESP handbook, one of the core competencies of an employment support professional is to facilitate the transfer of training and support to natural supports in the workplace1. Natural supports are the relationships and assistance that occur among co-workers and supervisors in a typical work environment2. They can help the supported employee to learn the job tasks, receive feedback, and integrate into the work culture3. Providing all the job training is not considered to be the role of the employment support professional because it may prevent the development of natural supports and create a dependency on the employment support professional. A better approach would be to provide initial training and fading support, while encouraging the involvement of co-workers and supervisors as naturalsupports4. Providing training and feedback to co-workers working with the supported employee, identifying accommodations to help the supported employee become more independent on the job, and developing natural supports are all considered to be the roles of the employment support professional. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5 2: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 18 3: Natural Supports in the Workplace 4: Job Coaching and Natural Supports

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, one of the core competencies of Domain 2 (Individualized Employment and Career Planning) is to “assist the job seeker in identifying interests, skills, preferences, and support needs related to employment”. This involves using various methods such as assessments, interviews, observations, and discovery activities to help the job seeker explore different career options and find a good match. Finding an apprenticeship, locating an internship, or placing the individual in an entry-level job are all possible outcomes of the career exploration process, but they are not the best way to start supporting the job seeker who has no work experience, no clear interests, and who is unsure about their career goals. 

The School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994 was a federal law that provided states with funds for designing school-to-work systems to better prepare all students for future careers and education1. The act emphasized the integration of youth with disabilities into the school-to-work system, rather than separate, set-aside programs (A), as well as the continuous communication and collaboration between members of the IEP and the transition planning team © and the clear definition of their roles and responsibilities (D)2. The act also required that the school-to-work system be consistent with the principles of self-determination and empowerment of students with disabilities, and that students participate in the planning and decision-makingprocess regarding their transition goals and services2. Therefore, the participation of the student’s family in the absence of the student in the planning and decision-making process, with a focus on the student’s preferences (B), is not recommended by the act, as it contradicts thestudent’s right to self-determination and involvement in their own transition plan. References: 1: The School-to-Work Opportunities Act 2: School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994

Fading from the worksite is a process used by employment support professionals (ESPs) to reduce the dependency of the supported employee on external support structures and increase their independence and integration in the workplace1. The most important factor in ensuring the continued success of the employee after fading is the availability and quality of natural supports from the co-workers2. Natural supports are the informal and formal assistance that co-workers provide to the employee with a disability, such as mentoring, coaching, feedback, socialization, and friendship3. Natural supports can enhance the employee’s performance, satisfaction, retention, and career development4. Therefore, if Ava’s co-workers are willing to provide various types anddegrees of work support for her, she is more likely to maintain and improve her skills, adapt to changes, and feel valued and accepted in the work environment5.

The other options are not as important as natural supports from co-workers. While Ava’s family’s feelings and Ava’s social interactions with co-workers may affect her motivation and well-being, they are not directly related to her work performance and outcomes6. Ava’s supervisor’s ability to contact the ESP whenever work expectations are not met is a contingency plan, but it does not ensure Ava’s success at work; rather, it implies a lack of trust and confidence in Ava’s abilities and natural supports7. References: 1: FADING FROM THE JOB SITE - SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT A CUSTOMER DRIVEN APPROACH 2: Natural Supports in the Workplace: A Reexamination of Supported Employment 3: Natural Supports in the Workplace: Defining an Agenda for Research and Practice 4: Natural Supports at Work: A Review of the Literature 5: Fading away at work: “I could have left without saying anything” – performing talent management in a multinational organization 6: The Impact of Family Support on the Success of Individuals with Disabilities in the Workplace 7: Job Site Fading - trn-store.com

According to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a person with a disability is not required to disclose their disability to an employer at any point in the hiring process, unless they need a reasonable accommodation to participate in the application process or to perform the essential functions of the job1. Therefore, Tom is not required to disclose his epilepsy to his employer before, during, or after the interview, unless he needs an accommodation such as flexible work hours, breaks, or a quiet work environment. If he does need an accommodation, he should disclose his disability before the accommodation is requested, and provide relevant documentation to support hisrequest2. References: 1: Disability Disclosure and Interviewing Techniques for Persons with Disabilities 2: CESP Content Outline - CESP

Work Incentives Planning and Assistance (WIPA) offices are funded by Social Security to provide information and counseling about work and benefits to people who receive Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) because of a disability1. One ofthe main services they provide is benefits analysis, which is an accurate and personalized assessment of how work will affect a person’s benefits and health insurance2. Benefits analysis can help people understand the availability and use of work incentives, such as the Trial Work Period, Expedited Reinstatement, and Protection from Medical Continuing Disability Reviews2. Benefits analysis can also help people plan and prepare for work, manage their benefits, and achieve their employment goals3. WIPA offices do not provide transportation, tutoring, or tax preparation services, which are not related to their mission and scope of work. References: 

https://choosework.ssa.gov/about/work-incentives/

https://www.ssa.gov/work//WIPA.html

 it is not a valid strategy for customizing a job for an employee. Customizing a job means creating or modifying a position that matches the skills and interests of the employee with the unmet needs of the employer1. Job duties that remove employees from their areas of expertise, and combine the tasks into one position to save employer money, do not meet this criterion. They may also result in lower quality of work, lower job satisfaction, and lower retention rates2.

Answer A is not correct, because it is a possible way to customize a job for an employee. Job duties not essential to the employer’s needs can be eliminated or reassigned to create a more focused and efficient position that suits the employee’s strengths and preferences1.

Answer C is not correct, because it is also a possible way to customize a job for an employee. Tasks that are not being done or done often enough, and negotiate a job description, can help to fill a gap in the employer’s operations and create a niche for the employee1.

Answer D is not correct, because it is another possible way to customize a job for an employee. Tasks for which the employer is paying overtime that could be combined into a position to save the company money, can help to reduce the employer’s costs and increase the employee’s productivity1. References: 

https://apse.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CESP-Practice-Exam-8-2.pdf

 A work-related organizational task is a task that involves arranging, ordering, or coordinating items or activities in a work setting1. The purpose of observing work-related organizational tasks is to assess the job-seeker’s skills, interests, and preferences for different types of work environments and occupations2. Therefore, the observation should be conducted in realistic and natural work settings that match the job-seeker’s vocational goals and potential career paths3.

In this case, the job-seeker is a student with a cognitive disability who enjoys organizational tasks. Options A, B, and D are all examples of work settings where the job-seeker can perform and observe various organizational tasks, such as stocking products, setting tables, and filing documents. These settings can also provide the job-seeker with exposure to different industries, such as retail, hospitality, and education, and help him explore his career interests and options. Option C, however, is not a work setting, but a home setting, where the job-seeker is putting away clean dishes. This option does not provide the job-seeker with a realistic or natural work experience, and it does not help him discover his vocational potential or preferences. Therefore, option C is the least appropriate environment to observe work-related organizational tasks. References: 1: CESP study guide Flashcards, question 8 2: Focus On: Six strategic steps for situational assessment, page 1 3: Certified Employment Support Professional Candidate Handbook, page 5

 According to the CESP handbook, one of the core competencies of an employment support professional is to facilitate self-employment and customized employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities1. Self-employment is a form of integrated employment that allows individuals to create their own businesses based on their strengths, preferences, and interests2. Customized employment is a process of individualizing the employment relationship between a job seeker and an employer based on the needs of both3. To facilitate self-employment and customized employment, an employment support professional may need to collaborate with various team members, such as small business development consultants, family members or friends, and other community partners4. However, a representative of the individual’s medical team may not be the most important team member to support his businessventure, as the medical team’s role is more focused on the individual’s health and rehabilitation needs, rather than his vocational goals and aspirations. While the medical team may provide some input on the individual’s abilities and limitations, they may not have the expertise or the authority to assist with the business and marketing plan, the coordination of resources and supports, or the networking, bookkeeping, and transportation aspects of the self-employment venture. Therefore, a representative of the individual’s medical team is the least important team member to support his business venture, compared to the other options. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5 2: Self-Employment for People with Disabilities 3: Customized Employment 4: Self-Employment Toolkit

Non-paid work experiences (NPWE) are opportunities for students and job-seekers with disabilities to gain exposure to different work settings and tasks, without receiving wages from the employer1. The purpose of NPWE is to provide vocational exploration, assessment, and training, and to facilitate the transition to competitive, integrated employment2. Therefore, NPWE must follow certain guidelines and regulations to ensure that they are not exploitative, discriminatory, or detrimental to the participants or the labor market3.

One of the key guidelines for NPWE is that they must not displace regular employees or impair existing contracts for services4. This means that the NPWE participants must not perform work that would otherwise be done by paid workers, or that would reduce the hours or wages of paid workers5. The NPWE participants must also not be used to fill in for absent employees, or to meet the employer’s labor needs during peak periods. The NPWE must be primarily for the benefit of the participant, not the employer.

In this case, option B is the most likely to be in violation of the guidelines for NPWE, as Susan is performing tasks that are normally done by the beauticians, such as cleaningand folding towels, sweeping the floors, and other odd jobs. Her work helps the beauticians, who are paid workers, and may reduce their workload or hours. This situation may also imply that Susan is not receiving adequate instruction, supervision, or support from the school or the employer, as she is not engaged in any meaningful or relevant work activities that match her vocational interests or goals. Therefore, option B is not a valid NPWE, but a form of exploitation or displacement of regular employees. References: 1: VA Non-Paid Work Experience Factsheet, page 1 2: Certified Employment Support Professional Candidate Handbook, page 5 3: CESP Examination Content Outline, Domain 2, 2Q 4: CESP Examination Content Outline, Domain 1, 1K 5: CESP study guide Flashcards, question 9 : CESP study guide Flashcards, question 10 : CESP study guide Flashcards, question 11

The best answer is A, because it reflects the individualized employment and career planning domain of the CESP certification. Setting up a job shadowing opportunity for the job seeker at a local veterinary office would help her explore her interests, goals, and aspirations in working with animals, as well as assess her skills, talents, and learning style. It would also provide a community-based work assessment that is relevant to herdesired career path, and help her build connections and relationships with potential employers and mentors12.

Answer B is not correct, because it contradicts the core values and principles of the CESP certification, such as promoting full inclusion in the general workforce, providing community-based services outside institutional, group, and pre-vocational settings, and respecting the right to work and earn wages commensurate with others in similar positions13. Enrolling the job seeker in a sheltered workshop that has a contract with a local pet store would segregate her from the general workforce, limit her opportunities for career advancement and economic self-sufficiency, and potentially exploit her labor and skills.

Answer C is not correct, because it does not demonstrate a rapid engagement of the job seeker in the employment process, nor does it provide a sufficient level of support and guidance for her to find a suitable and satisfying job. Helping her apply online for animal-related jobs would not necessarily match her strengths, interests, needs, and conditions for employment, nor would it help her develop the necessary skills and competencies for working with animals. It would also rely on a passive and impersonal job search method that may not yield positive results or feedback14.

Answer D is not correct, because it does not reflect a good job development practice, nor does it take into account the job seeker’s preferences and readiness for employment. Setting up a job interview for her at a local pet store would not ensure that the job is aligned with her career goals, nor would it help her prepare for the interview process. It would also bypass the important steps of gathering and analyzing labor market information, identifying patterns in job markets, and maintaining updated information on businesses, type of jobs available, and locations of jobs within the community15. References: https://cesp.helpscoutdocs.com/article/637-cesp-examination-content-outline

https://www.apse.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/CESP%20Candidate%20Handbook.1.123.pdf

 The most important activity to prepare Tanya to start work is to spend time on the job site learning about the job duties and preparing a job task analysis and identifying co-workers to help support her. This is because this activity will help you to understand the expectations and requirements of the job, as well as the culture and environment of the workplace. You will also be able to identify the skills and supports that Tanya will need to perform the tasks and interact with others. A job task analysis is a tool that breaks down the job into its essential components and describes the steps, skills, and conditions involved in each task1. Identifying co-workers to help support Tanya is part of the natural supports strategy, which involves using the existing resources and relationships in the workplace to provide ongoing assistance and integration for the employee with a disability2.

References:

• 1: Job Task Analysis: A Guide for Employment Support Professionals1
• 2: Natural Supports: A Guide for Employment Support Professionals2

The best practice in assisting a person to find a job of choice is to use a “discovery” process that includes situational assessments based on the individual’s identified interests. This is because this process allows the job coach to learn about the person’s strengths, preferences, skills, and support needs in various settings and situations, rather than relying on formal records or standardized tests that may not capture the person’s true potential or motivation1. The discovery process also involves the person and their family, friends, and other natural supports in identifying their employment goals and developing a career plan2.

References:

• 1: Discovery: A Guide for Employment Support Professionals1
• 2: The Discovery Process: An Introduction2

Employment First is a national systems-change framework centered on the premise that all individuals, including those individuals with the most significant disabilities, are capable of full participation in Competitive Integrated Employment (CIE) and community life1. Under this approach, publicly-financed systems are urged to align policies, regulatory guidance, andreimbursement structures to commit to CIE as the priority option with respect to the use of publicly-financed day and employment services for youth and adults with significant disabilities1. Many states have formally committed to the Employment First framework through official executive proclamation or formal legislative action1. Employment First is also one of the core values and principles of APSE, the Association of People Supporting Employment First2. References: 1: Employment First | U.S. Department of Labor 2: About APSE - APSE

Job coach services are an example of an Impairment Related Work Expense (IRWE). An IRWE is a cost for an item or service that a person with a disability needs in order to work because of their impairment1. Social Security will deduct the costs of an IRWE from the person’s countable income when determining their eligibility for Social Security disability benefits or Supplemental Security Income (SSI)1. Job coach services are a type of assistance that a person with a disability may require in order to perform their job duties, learn new skills, or adjust to the work environment2. Job coach services are not reimbursed by another source, such as the employer or a vocational rehabilitation agency, and the cost is reasonable, meaning that it represents the standard charge for the service in the community1. Therefore, job coach services meet the criteria for an IRWE and can be deducted from the person’s earnings.

The other options are not examples of an IRWE. Accommodations are changes or modifications that an employer makes to the work environment, equipment, or schedule to enable a person with a disability to perform their job3. Accommodations are not an IRWE because they are not paid by the person with a disability, but by the employer as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)3. An individualized plan for employment (IPE) is a document that outlines the goals, services, and supports that a person with a disability needs to achieve their desired employment outcome4. An IPE is not an IRWE because it is not a cost for an item or service, but a plan that guides the person’s vocational rehabilitation process4. Transportation is a cost for getting to andfrom work, such as bus fare, taxi, or car expenses5. Transportation is not an IRWE unless the person with a disability needs a special transportation service because of their impairment, such as a wheelchair-accessible van or a personal driver5. If the person usesthe same transportation service as the general public, the cost is not deductible as an IRWE5.

References: 1: Impairment-Related Work Expenses - Social Security 2: Job Coach Services - CareerOneStop 3: Reasonable Accommodations - U.S. Department of Labor 4: Individualized Plan for Employment - Social Security 5: DI 10520.001 Impairment-Related Work Expenses (IRWE) - Social Security

The core pre-employment transition requirement that is met when teaching a student about disclosing a disability is self-advocacy. Self-advocacy is one of the five required activities that VRagencies must provide to students with disabilities under the WIOA regulations. Self-advocacy includes instruction in self-awareness, disability disclosure, requesting accommodations, understanding rights and responsibilities, and self-determination. Teaching a student about disclosing a disability helps them to make informed choices about whether, when, how, and to whom to disclose their disability, and to understand the potential benefits and consequences of doing so. Disclosing a disability is a personal decision that may affect the student’s access to services, supports, and opportunities in education, employment, and other settings. References: RSA Frequently-Asked Questions about Pre-Employment Transition Services, Pre-Employment Transition Services (Pre-ETS): The Five Required Activities for Students with Disabilities, Disclosing a Disability to an Employer: Your Rights, Disclosing an invisible disability

The best response the employment support professional (ESP) can offer to relieve the employer’s concern is to assure them that they can provide assistance and guidance to the employee’s co-workers if there are any issues or challenges related to working with a person with disabilities. This response shows that the ESP is committed to supporting the employee’s successful integration and inclusion in the workplace, and that they are willing to address any potential problems that may arise from negative or inaccurate attitudes toward the employee with disabilities. The ESP can also offer to provide information, education, or training to the co-workers to help them understand the employee’s disability, strengths, and needs, and to foster positive and respectful interactions. This response is consistent with the evidence-basedpractices and principles of supported employment, which emphasize the role of the ESP as a facilitator and a resource for both the employee and the employer

The LEAST appropriate response to the female’s concern is B, because it implies that she should not do an assessment unless she knows exactly what she wants to do. This is contrary to the purpose of situational assessments, which are meant to help individuals with disabilities explore their interests, skills, and preferences in different work environments1. Telling her that it is best to have a clear idea of her career goal may discourage her from trying new things and limit her options. The other responses are more supportive and reassuring, as they emphasize the benefits of assessments and acknowledge her feelings. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5. Download here.

 Motivational interviewing is a collaborative, goal-oriented method of communication that aims to enhance the individual’s intrinsic motivation to change1. It is based on four principles: expressing empathy, developing discrepancy, rolling with resistance, and supporting self-efficacy2. Motivational interviewing does not involve deferring to the vocational rehabilitation counselor for decision making, as this would undermine the individual’s autonomy and self-determination. Rather, motivational interviewing respects the individual’s perspective and preferences, and helps them explore and resolve their own ambivalence to change3. References:

• Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change, Chapter 1
• Motivational Interviewing in Employment Services, page 4
• APSE CESP Study Guide, page 18, Section 2.2.1

 People First Language is a way of communicating respectfully and appropriately with and about people with disabilities. It puts the person before the diagnosis, describing what condition a person “has” rather than asserting what a person “is”. It avoids using labels or adjectives that define or dehumanize someone based on their disability. Forexample, instead of saying “a diabetic”, we can say “a person with diabetes”. This way, we emphasize the person’s individuality, personhood, and dignity, not their disability.

In the given options, only D. He is a person with autism follows the People First Language. It refers to the person first, and then to the condition that he has. The other options use offensive, insensitive, or outdated terms that imply negative stereotypes or limitations. For example, A. He is disabled suggests that the person is defined by his disability, and does not acknowledge his abilities or potential. B. She is brain damaged is a derogatory and inaccurate term that does not respect the person’s cognitive or intellectual abilities. C. She is confined to a wheelchair implies that the person is trapped or restricted by their mobility device, rather than empowered or assisted by it. References: 

https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/materials/factsheets/fs-communicating-with-people.html

https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/science-health-public-trust/perspectives/writing-respectfully-person-first-identity-first-language

 When contacting employers to begin job development, it is best to ask for the best time for the employer to meet with you. This shows respect for the employer’s time and schedule, and also allows you to establish rapport and interest. Asking for the best time also gives you an opportunity to follow up and confirm the meeting, and to prepare for the meeting by researching the employer and their needs12. The other options (A, C, and D) are not effective ways to contact employers, as they may be perceived as intrusive, unprofessional, or disinterested. References: 1: Informational Interviewing - Association of People Supporting Employment First 2: CESP study guide Flashcards | Quizlet

• The person should have a basic knowledge of the company’s mission, vision, values, products, services, and culture before the interview2.
• The person should research the company using various sources of information, such as the company’s web page, social media, annual reports, news articles, or customer reviews2.
• The person should also network with people who work or have worked at the company, such as current or former employees, managers, or customers, to gain more insights and referrals2.
• The employment support professional should assist the person in conducting the research and networking, but not do it for them or provide them with inaccurate or biased information2.
• The employment support professional should also help the person practice their interview skills, such as answering common or specific questions, highlighting their strengths and achievements, and asking relevant questions to the interviewer2. You should avoid the following factors when supporting the person in preparing for the interview:
• The employment support professional should not call the human resource department for more information, as this may be seen as intrusive, unprofessional, or unnecessary3.
• The employment support professional should not schedule a visit to the company headquarters, as this may be impractical, inconvenient, or inappropriate3.
• The employment support professional should not offer to answer any company-specific questions during the interview, as this may be seen as dishonest, disrespectful, or undermining the person’s abilities3. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5 2: How to Research a Company Before Your Job Interview 3: What Not to Do Before a Job Interview

 The best option for the employment support professional to do is to recommend the family consult with a benefits specialist. A benefits specialist is someone who can provide accurate and individualized information on how work and earnings may affect the student’s eligibility for SSI and other public benefits, such as Medicaid, food stamps, or housing assistance. A benefits specialist can also explain the various work incentives and programs that are available to help the student transition to work without losing essential benefits and supports. For example, the student may qualify for the student earned income exclusion, which allows a student under age 22 and regularly attending school to exclude some or all of their earnings from income when determining their SSI benefit amount12. A benefits specialist can also help the student and the family plan for future goals and needs, such as saving for education, training, or assistive technology.

The other options are not appropriate for the employment support professional to do because:

• A. Advising the family that the student is required to work as part of the transition plan may be seen as coercive or insensitive to the family’s concerns and fears. It may also create conflict or resistance between the family and the school or the employment support professional. The student’s transition plan should be based on the student’s preferences, interests, needs, and strengths, and should involve the collaboration and agreement of all parties involved, including the student, the family, the school, and the employment support professional.
• B. Informing the family that the student can work 15 hours per week without affecting benefits and insurance may be inaccurate or misleading, as the impact of work and earnings on benefits and insurance may vary depending on the student’s individual situation and the type and amount of income they receive. It may also be insufficient to address the family’s concerns and questions, as they may need more detailed and specific information on how work and earnings may affect the student’s current and future benefits and supports.
• C. Agreeing with the family that the student who has SSI cannot work may be discouraging or limiting for the student’s potential and opportunities. It may also be contrary to the core values and principles of the employment support professional, which include promoting the inclusion, empowerment, and self-determination of people with disabilities in the workforce and society. It may also be inconsistent with the evidence and best practices that show that people with disabilities can work and achieve positive outcomes with appropriate supports and accommodations. References:
• SSI Spotlight on Student Earned Income Exclusion
• SSI Rules for College Students

The work hours are the least likely factor to be causing his current difficulties at work, because he has been working the same hours for two years without any problems. The other factors (A, C, and D) are more likely to affect his performance and alertness, as they can change over time or have an impact on his mental and physical well-being. For example, his medication may have side effects, his sleeping pattern/schedule may be disrupted, or his general health/mental illness may worsen or fluctuate. These factors may require adjustments or accommodations to help him succeed at work. References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam, Question 1
• CESP Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Task 4.2
• CESP Handbook, page 12

This answer respects the job seeker’s right to privacy and self-determination, as well as the legal requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)1. The ADA prohibits employers from asking about a person’s disability before making a job offer, unless it is related to an essential job function or a reasonable accommodation2. The job seeker has the choice to disclose or not disclose her disability, and the employment support professional should honor that choice and obtain her consent before sharing any information with the employer34. The other answers are not appropriate because they either violate the job seeker’s rights, damage the relationship with the employer, or provide unnecessary information that could lead to discrimination or stigma. References:

• Domain 1 Application of Core Values and Principles to Practice1234
• Domain 2 Individualized Employment and Career Planning1234

Focusing on a job-seeker’s vision of their future is a component of person-centered planning. Person-centered planning is a process for selecting and organizing the services and supports that an individual may need to live and work in the community. It is a process that is directed by the person who receives the support, and that reflects their preferences, strengths, and goals1. Person-centered planning helps the job-seeker to identify their desired outcomes, and to develop a plan to achieve them with the help of a team of people who care about them2. Person-centered planning is based on the values of self-determination, inclusion, and empowerment3.

Task analysis, systematic instruction, and people-first language are not components of person-centered planning, but rather methods or strategies that can be used to support the person in their employment journey. Task analysis is the method of breaking down a complex task into smaller and simpler steps, and teaching them in a sequential order4. Systematic instruction is the method of providing clear and consistent cues, prompts, feedback, and reinforcement to help the person learn and perform a task5. People-first language is the way of communicating that respects the person as an individual, and avoids labels or stereotypes based on their disability6. References:

• Person Centered Planning | ACL Administration for Community Living
• Person-Centered Planning - National Parent Center on Transition and Employment
• What is Person-Centered Planning? - University of Florida
• Task Analysis - Association of People Supporting Employment First
• Systematic Instruction - Association of People Supporting Employment First
• People First Language - Association of People Supporting Employment First

 A fading plan is a strategy that the employment support professional (ESP) uses to gradually reduce the amount and frequency of support that they provide to the job-seeker, while increasing the use of natural supports from the employer and co-workers12. The goal of a fading plan is to help the job-seeker work independently and integrate socially in the workplace, without relying on the ESP for assistance3. A fadingplan should be individualized, flexible, and based on the job-seeker’s needs and preferences4.

The other options are not the best choices for supporting the job-seeker to work independently. A benefits plan is a document that outlines the impact of employment income on the job-seeker’s public benefits, such as Social Security or Medicaid5. While a benefits plan can help the job-seeker make informed decisions about working, it does not directly address the issue of reducing the ESP’s support. A risk assessment is a process of identifying and evaluating the potential hazards and threats that the job-seeker may face in the workplace, such as health and safety risks, discrimination, or harassment6. While a risk assessment can help the ESP and the employer mitigate or prevent these risks, it does not directly address the issue of increasing the job-seeker’s independence. A job skills assessment is a tool that measures the job-seeker’s abilities, interests, and aptitudes for different types of work7. While a job skills assessment canhelp the ESP and the job-seeker find a suitable job match, it does not directly address the issue of decreasing the ESP’s intervention.

References: 1: Fading and Support Strategies for Employment Success 2: Natural Supports and Fading Background Information 3: Job Site Fading 4: NATURAL SUPPORTS – FADING PLAN 5: Benefits Planning Services | U.S. Department of Labor 6: Risk Assessment | Health and Safety Authority 7: Job Skills Assessment - CareerOneStop

Motivational interviewing is a client-centered, directive method for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence1. It is based on the principles of collaboration, evocation, and autonomy2. The best question to ask using motivational interviewing techniques is one that reflects these principles and helps the client to examine their own reasons and consequences for their behavior. Therefore, the option C, “Can you help me understand your decision to steal candy?” is the best question to ask, as it invites the client to share their perspective without judgment, expresses curiosity and empathy, and allows the client to have autonomy over their choices. The other options are not consistent with motivational interviewing techniques because:

• A. “What do you think will happen if you get caught by the manager?” is a question that focuses on the external consequences of the behavior, rather than the internal motivation to change. It may also imply a threat or a warning, which could increase the client’s resistance or defensiveness.
• B. “If you get caught you can be prosecuted; are you going to keep stealing?” is a question that confronts the client with a negative outcome and a closed-ended question that limits the client’s response. It may also elicit a negative reaction from the client, such as denial, rationalization, or hostility.
• D. “That was not very smart; what made you think that was a good idea?” is a question that criticizes the client’s intelligence and judgment, and implies that the counselor knows better than the client. It may also damage the rapport and trust between the counselor and the client, and make the client feel ashamed or angry. References:
• Motivational Interviewing
• Motivational Interviewing: Definition, Techniques, and Efficacy

Psychiatric labels, such as “schizophrenics” and “borderlines”, are stigmatizing and inaccurate ways of referring to people with psychiatric disabilities. These terms do not reflect the diversity and complexity of each individual’s experience, strengths, and needs. They also do not indicate anything about an individual’s capability for employment, as people with psychiatric disabilities can work successfully in a variety ofsettings and roles, with or without reasonable accommodations. Psychiatric labels are not good predictors of employment type, level, or capacity, as these factors depend on many other variables, such as education, skills, interests, motivation, support, and opportunities. Therefore, the correct answer is B. References:

• Accommodations for Employees with Mental Health Conditions
• Depression, PTSD, & Other Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace: Your Legal Rights
• Mental Health Conditions in the Workplace and the ADA

According to the CESP handbook, one of the core competencies of an employment support professional is to facilitate natural supports in the workplace1. Natural supports are the relationships and assistance that occur among co-workers and supervisors in a typical work environment2. They can help the employee with ADHD to integrate into the work culture, learn new skills, and receive feedback and encouragement3. Working with the employee at all times to keep him on task is the least important structured activity because it may undermine his autonomy, self-confidence, and motivation. It may also create a dependency on the employment support professional and prevent the development of natural supports. A better approach would be to help the employee find strategies to cope with his ADHD symptoms, such as minimizing distractions, breaking down tasks, using reminders, and taking breaks4. Movinghim to a less busy time of the day, developing a routine of tasks, and having the co-workers be his natural supports are all more important structured activities than working with him at all times. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5 2: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 18 3: Natural Supports in the Workplace 4: ADHD in the Workplace

The best option to address this issue is to collect data on how many forms the worker enters per hour to establish a baseline comparison of her performance to the job site’s production standard. This will help you to identify the gap between the worker’s current and expected productivity, and to monitor her progress over time. It will also provide objective evidence to support any requests for accommodations or modifications that may be needed to help the worker succeed in her job. The other options are not recommended, as they may have negative consequences for the worker, the employer, or yourself. Continuing the training program as designed may not be effective or sufficient to address the worker’s difficulties, and may lead to frustration or failure. Asking the employer for an accommodation and negotiating a lower production rate for the worker may not be feasible or fair, and may stigmatize the worker or lower her self-esteem. Assuring the employer that you will get the work done by completing some of the data entry yourself is unethical and unprofessional, as it violates the principles of informed choice, empowerment, and independence for the worker, and may create dependency or resentment. References: Employment after Traumatic Brain Injury, Job Accommodations for People with Brain Injuries, Best Practices for Communicating Through an Interpreter

Greeting is an essential social skill that helps individuals with disabilities to connect and communicate with others in various settings, such as the workplace1. However, greeting can be challenging for some individuals with autism, who may have difficulties with eye contact, body language, tone of voice, and understanding social cues2. Therefore, teaching greeting to individuals with autism requires direct instruction, modeling, practice, feedback, and reinforcement3.

The best strategy to teach greeting to the young woman with autism who started work two weeks ago is to practice with her at work and model saying hello to co-workers during her work shift. This strategy has several advantages:

• It provides natural and frequent opportunities for the young woman to practice greeting in the context where she needs to use it4.
• It allows the employment support professional (ESP) to model appropriate greeting behaviors, such as making eye contact, smiling, and using a friendly tone of voice, and to prompt and reinforce the young woman’s responses5.
• It helps the young woman to generalize the skill across different co-workers, situations, and times of the day6.
• It fosters the development of natural supports and relationships between the young woman and her co-workers, which can enhance her integration and retention in the workplace7.

The other strategies are not as effective as the one above, because:

• Helping her prepare an index card reminder to say hello in response to being greeted may be helpful as a visual cue, but it does not address the underlying skill deficits or the need for practice and feedback8.
• Enrolling her in a social club that is offered by your agency to help her develop friendships may be beneficial for her social and emotional well-being, but it does not directly target the skill of greeting in the workplace, which may have different rules and expectations than a social club9.
• Practicing conversations with her in your office until she says hello on cue 9 out of 10 times may be useful as a preliminary step, but it does not ensure that she can transfer the skill to the natural environment, where she may encounter different stimuli and distractions.

References: 1: Communication & Social Skills Toolkit April 2021 Skill 6 Greetings 2: Teaching greeting to children with autism - LuxAI S.A. 3: Teaching Greetings: How to Respond to Hello | Blue Parachute 4: Naturalistic Intervention Fact Sheet - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 5: Modeling - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 6: Generalization and Maintenance of Skills - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 7: Natural Supports in the Workplace: A Reexamination of Supported Employment 8: Visual Supports - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 9: Social Skills and Autism Spectrum Disorder - Autism Speaks : Discrete Trial Training - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder