ACAMS CAMS-FCI Dumps Questions Answers

An investigator at a corporate bank is conducting transaction monitoring alerts clearance.

KYC profile background: An entity customer, doing business offshore in Hong Kong, established a banking business relationship with the bank since 2017 for deposit and loan purposes. It acts as an offshore investment holding company. The customer declared that the ongoing source of funds to this account comes from group-related companies.

• X is the UBO. and owns 97% shares of this entity customer;

• Y is is the authorized signatory of this entity customer. This entity customer was previously the subject of a SAR/STR.

KYC PROFILE

Customer Name: AAA International Company. Ltd

Customer ID: 123456

Account Opened: June 2017

Last KYC review date: 15 Nov 2020

Country and Year of Incorporation: The British Virgin Islands, May 2017

AML risk level: High

Account opening and purpose: Deposits, Loans and Trade Finance

Anticipated account activities: 1 to 5 transactions per year and around 1 million per

transaction amount

During the investigation, the investigator reviewed remittance transactions activities for the period from Jul 2019 to Sep 2021 and noted the following transactions pattern:

TRANSACTION JOURNAL

Review dates: from July 2019 to Sept 2021

For Hong Kong Dollars (HKD) currency:

Incoming transactions: 2 inward remittances of around 1.88 million HKD in total from

different third parties

Outgoing transactions: 24 outward remittances of around 9 4 million HKD in total to

different third parties

For United States Dollars (USD) currency:

Incoming transactions: 13 inward remittances of around 3.3 million USD in total from

different third parties

Outgoing transactions: 10 outward remittances of around 9.4 million USD in total to

different third parties.

RFI Information and Supporting documents:

According to the RFI reply received on 26 May 2021, the customer provided the bank

with the information below:

1) All incoming funds received in HKD & USD currencies were monies lent from non-customers of the bank. Copies of loan agreements had been provided as supporting documents. All of the loan agreements were in the same format and all the lenders are engaged in trading business.

2) Some loan agreements were signed among four parties, including among lenders. borrower (the bank's customer), guarantor, and guardian with supplemental agreements, which stated that the customer, as a borrower, who failed to repay the loan

After reviewing the transaction journal, request for information response, and supporting documentation, the investigator determines that additional information is needed. Which additional information should the investigator request?

During transaction monitoring. Bank A learns that one of their customers. Med Supplies 123, is attempting to make a payment via wire totaling 382,500 USD to PPE Business LLC located in Mexico to purchase a large order of personal protective equipment. specifically surgical masks and face shields. Upon further verification. Bank A decides to escalate and refers the case to investigators.

Bank A notes that, days prior to the above transaction, the same customer went to a Bank A location to wire 1,215,280 USD to Breath Well LTD located in Singapore. Breath Well was acting as an intermediary to purchase both 3-ply surgical masks and face shields from China. Bank A decided not to complete the transaction due to concerns with the involved supplier in China. Moreover, the customer is attempting to send a third wire in the amount of 350,000 USD for the purchase of these items, this time using a different vendor in China. The investigator must determine next steps in the investigation and what actions, if any. should be taken against relevant parties.

Upon further investigation. Bank As investigator learns that both the Mexico- and Singapore-based companies are linked to the alleged suppliers in China. Which additional indicators would the investigator need to identify to determine if this fits a fentanyl (drug) trafficking typology? (Select Two.)

SAR/STR NARRATIVE

A SAR/STR has been submitted on five transactions conducted on the correspondent banking relationship with ABC Bank.

Client Information:

Remitter information: DEF Oil Resource Ltd. is the oldest member of the DEF Group. It was founded in 1977 as a general trading business with a primary focus on exports from Africa and North America. The group has business activities that span the entire energy value chain. Their core field of endeavor is centered within the oil and gas industry and its associated sub-sectors.

Beneficiary Information:

As per the response received from ABC Bank, it was determined that the beneficiaries are related to DEF Oil Resource Ltd. These were created by DEF Oil Resource Ltd. to purchase property in a foreign country on behalf of their senior management as part of a bonus scheme. The purpose behind this payment was for the purchase of property in another country.

Payment Reference:

ABCXXXXX31PZFG2H

ABCXXXXXX51PQGEH

ABCXXXXXX214QWVG

ABCXXXXXX41PSXA2

ABCXXXXXX815QWS3

Concerns:

• We are unsure about the country of incorporation of the beneficiaries.

• We are concerned about the transactional activity since the payment made towards entities (conducted on behalf of individuals) appears to be possible tax evasion.

• There appears to be an attempt to conceal the identity of individuals (senior management), which again raises concerns about the source of funds.

• Referring to the response received from ABC Bank, we are unclear about the ultimate beneficiary of funds.

• The remitter is involved in a high-risk business, (i.e., oil and crude products trading), and the beneficiary is involved in real estate business which again poses a higher risk.

While reviewing the account activity, it is noted that several transfers are sent to a company located in an offshore jurisdiction. Which step should the investigator take next?