Professional-Cloud-DevOps-Engineer Google Cloud Certified - Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam Questions and Answers

The best option for implementing the rollback actions is to update the Kubernetes Service to point to the previous Kubernetes Deployment. A Kubernetes Service is a resource that defines how to access a set of Pods. A Kubernetes Deployment is a resource that manages the creation and update of Pods. By using the blue/green deployment methodology, you can create two Deployments, one for the current version (blue) and one for the new version (green), and use a Service to switch traffic between them. If you need to rollback, you can update the Service to point to the previous Deployment (blue) and stop sending traffic to the new Deployment (green).

https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/routing/overview

The correct answer is B. Apply the constraints/iam.disableServiceAccountKeyCreation constraint to the organization.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, the constraints/iam.disableServiceAccountKeyCreation constraint is an organization policy constraint that prevents the creation of user-managed service account keys1. User-managed service account keys are long-lived credentials that can be downloaded as JSON or P12 files and used to authenticate as a service account2. These keys pose severe security risks if they are leaked, stolen, or misused by unauthorized entities34. By applying this constraint to the organization, you can completely eliminate the risks associated with the use of JSON service account keys and enforce a more secure alternative for authentication, such as Workload Identity or short-lived access tokens12. This also minimizes operational overhead by avoiding the need to manage, rotate, or revoke user-managed service account keys.

The other options are incorrect because they do not completely eliminate the risks associated with the use of JSON service account keys. Option A is incorrect because it only restricts the IAM permissions to create, list, get, delete, or sign service account keys, but it does not prevent existing keys from being used or leaked. Option C is incorrect because it only disables the upload of user-managed service account keys, but it does not prevent the creation or download of such keys. Option D is incorrect because it only limits the IAM role that can create and manage service account keys, but it does not prevent the keys from being distributed or exposed to unauthorized entities.

https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/agent/monitoring/troubleshooting#checklist

https://sre.google/workbook/implementing-slos/

In the SRE principles book, it's recommended treating the SLI as the ratio of two numbers: the number of good events divided by the total number of events. For example: Number of successful HTTP requests / total HTTP requests (success rate)

Create log views for each project team, and only show each project team their application logs. Grant the operations team access to the _AllLogs View in the central logging project1.

This approach aligns with the Google Cloud’s recommended methodologies for Professional Cloud DevOps Engineers1. Log views allow you to create and manage access control at a finer granularity for your logs. By creating a separate log view for each project team, you can ensure that they only have access to their respective logs. The operations team, on the other hand, can be granted access to the _AllLogs view in the central logging project, allowing them to view all logs as required.

This solution not only meets the security team’s requirements but also minimizes costs as it leverages built-in features of Google Cloud’s logging and does not require exporting logs to another service like BigQuery (as suggested in option A), which could incur additional costs1.

Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure1. Cloud Build can be used as a pipeline runner for your CI pipeline, which is a process that automates the integration and testing of your code2. Cloud Build private pools are private, dedicated pools of workers that offer greater customization over the build environment, including the ability to access resources in a private VPC network3. A VPC network is a virtual network that provides connectivity for your Google Cloud resources and services. By using Cloud Build private pools, you can implement a solution that minimizes management overhead, as Cloud Build private pools are hosted and fully-managed by Cloud Build and scale up and down to zero, with no infrastructure to set up, upgrade, or scale3. You can also implement a solution that meets your security requirement, as Cloud Build private pools use network peering to connect into your private VPC network and do not expose API traffic publicly.

https://cloud.google.com/architecture/automated-canary-analysis-kubernetes-engine-spinnaker

https://spinnaker.io/guides/user/canary/best-practices/#compare-canary-against-baseline-not-against-production

https://medium.com/google-cloud/fluentd-filter-plugin-for-google-cloud-data-loss-prevention-api-42bbb1308e76

Google always aims to first stop the impact of an incident, and then find the root cause (unless the root cause just happens to be identified early on).

The best options for reducing toil in the pipeline and minimizing the amount of time it takes to complete an end-to-end deployment are to create a trigger to notify the required team to complete the next step when manual intervention is required and to automate promotion approvals from the development environment to the test environment. A trigger is a resource that initiates a deployment when an event occurs, such as a code change, a schedule, or a manual request. You can create a trigger to notify the required team to complete the next step when manual intervention is required by using Cloud Build or Cloud Functions. This way, you can reduce the waiting time and human errors in the pipeline. A promotion approval is a process that allows you to approve or reject a deployment from one environment to another, such as from development to test. You can automate promotion approvals from the development environment to the test environment by using Google Cloud Deploy or Cloud Build. This way, you can speed up the deployment process and avoid manual steps.

https://cloud.google.com/architecture/prep-kubernetes-engine-for-prod#roles_and_groups

https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/access-control

The logging.configWriter role grants permissions to create, update, and delete log exports. This is the correct role to give team members who need to export logs2.

https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/best-practices

https://cloud.google.com/build/docs/speeding-up-builds#caching_directories_with_google_cloud_storage

Caching directories with Google Cloud Storage To increase the speed of a build, reuse the results from a previous build. You can copy the results of a previous build to a Google Cloud Storage bucket, use the results for faster calculation, and then copy the new results back to the bucket. Use this method when your build takes a long time and produces a small number of files that does not take time to copy to and from Google Cloud Storage.

   upvoted 2 times

The best option for managing all charts uniformly, with native access control and VPC Service Controls is to store public and private charts in OCI format by using Artifact Registry. Artifact Registry is a service that allows you to store and manage container images and other artifacts in Google Cloud. Artifact Registry supports OCI format, which is an open standard for storing container images and other artifacts such as Helm charts. You can use Artifact Registry to store public and private charts in OCI format and manage them uniformly. You can also use Artifact Registry’s native access control features, such as IAM policies and VPC Service Controls, to secure your charts and control who can access them.

a latency SLO is a service level objective that specifies a target level of responsiveness for a web application1. A latency SLO can be expressed as a percentile of latency over a time window, such as the 90th percentile of latency over 28 days2. A percentile of latency is the maximum amount of time that a given percentage of requests take to complete. For example, the 90th percentile of latency is the maximum amount of time that 90% of requests take to complete3.

To define a latency SLO, you need to consider the following factors24:

• The expectations and satisfaction of your customers. You want to set a latency SLO that reflects the level of performance that your customers are happy with and willing to pay for.
• The current and historical measurements of your latency. You want to set a latency SLO that is based on data and realistic for your web application.
• The trade-offs and costs of improving your latency. You want to set a latency SLO that balances the benefits of faster response times with the costs of engineering work, infrastructure, and complexity.

Based on these factors, the best option for defining a latency SLO for your web application is option B. Option B sets the latency SLO to match the current measurement of your latency, which means that you are meeting the expectations and satisfaction of your customers. Option B also sets a realistic and achievable target for your web application, which means that you do not need to invest extra resources or effort to improve your latency. Option B also aligns with the best practice of setting conservative SLOs, which means that you have some buffer or margin for error in case your latency fluctuates or degrades5.

The best option for deploying a new release of your microservice on Cloud Run and testing it extensively in the staging and production environments with minimal user and developer impact is to deploy the new version of the service to the staging environment with a new-release tag without serving traffic, test the new-release version, and if the test passes, gradually roll out this tagged version. A tag is a label that you can assign to a revision of your service on Cloud Run. You can use tags to create different versions of your service without affecting traffic. You can also use tags to gradually roll out traffic to a new version of your service by using traffic splitting. This way, you can test your new release extensively in both environments and minimize user and developer impact.

The best option for implementing a scalable solution to support global Prometheus querying and minimize management overhead is to use Google Cloud Managed Service for Prometheus. Google Cloud Managed Service for Prometheus is a fully managed service that allows you to collect, query, and visualize metrics from your GKE clusters using Prometheus-based tooling. You can use Google Cloud Managed Service for Prometheus to query metrics across multiple clusters and regions using a global view. You can also use Google Cloud Managed Service for Prometheus to integrate with other Google Cloud services, such as Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, and BigQuery. By using Google Cloud Managed Service for Prometheus, you can avoid managing and scaling your own Prometheus servers and focus on your application performance.

The best option for giving developers the ability to test the latest revisions of the service before the service is exposed to customers is to run the gcloud run deploy booking-engine --no-traffic --tag dev command and use the https://dev----booking-engine-abcdef.a.run.app URL for testing. The gcloud run deploy command is a command that deploys a new revision of your service or updates an existing service. By using the --no-traffic flag, you can prevent any traffic from being sent to the new revision. By using the --tag flag, you can assign a tag to the new revision, such as dev. This way, you can create a new revision of your service without affecting your customers. You can also use the tag-based URL (e.g., https://dev----booking-engine-abcdef.a.run.app) to access and test the new revision.

The first thing you should do to prepare your ecommerce application for the upcoming peak traffic season is to load test the application to profile its performance for scaling. Load testing is a process of simulating high traffic or user demand on your application and measuring how it responds. Load testing can help you identify any bottlenecks, errors, or performance issues that might affect your application during the busy season1. Load testing can also help you determine the optimal scaling strategy for your application, such as horizontal scaling (adding more instances) or vertical scaling (adding more resources to each instance)2.

There are different tools and methods for load testing your ecommerce application on Google Cloud, depending on the type and complexity of your application. For example, you can use Cloud Load Balancing to distribute traffic across multiple instances of your application, and use Cloud Monitoring to measure the latency, throughput, and error rate of your application3. You can also use Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to create serverless load generators that can simulate user requests and send them to your application4. Alternatively, you can use third-party tools such as Apache JMeter or Locust to create and run load tests on your application.

By load testing your ecommerce application before the peak traffic season, you can ensure that your application is ready to handle the expected load and provide a good user experience. You can also use the results of your load tests to plan and implement other steps to prepare your application for the busy season, such as migrating to a more scalable platform, creating a Terraform configuration for deploying to additional regions, or pre-provisioning additional compute power.

References:

1: Load Testing 101: How To Test Website Performance | BlazeMeter

2: Scaling applications | Google Cloud

3: Load testing using Google Cloud | Solutions | Google Cloud

4: Serverless load testing using Cloud Functions | Solutions | Google Cloud

https://cloud.google.com/build/docs/deploying-builds/deploy-gke

https://cloud.google.com/build/docs/securing-builds/configure-user-specified-service-accounts

The best option for making the third-party application work while following Google-recommended security practices is to add a rule to set the iam.disableServiceAccountKeyCreation policy to off in your project and create a key. The iam.disableServiceAccountKeyCreation policy is an organization policy that controls whether service account keys can be created in a project or organization. By default, this policy is set to on, which means that service account keys cannot be created. However, you can override this policy at a lower level, such as a project, by adding a rule to set it to off. This way, you can create a service account key for your project without affecting other projects or organizations. You should also follow the best practices for managing service account keys, such as rotating them regularly, storing them securely, and deleting them when they are no longer needed.

The correct answer is D. Grant the roles/storage.objectAdmin Identity and Access Management (IAM) role to the Cloud Build service account on the state file bucket.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure1. Cloud Build uses a service account to execute your build steps and access resources, such as Cloud Storage buckets2. Terraform is an open-source tool that allows you to define and provision infrastructure as code3. Terraform uses a state file to store and track the state of your infrastructure4. You can configure Terraform to use a Cloud Storage bucket as a backend to store and share the state file across multiple users or environments5.

The error message indicates that Cloud Build failed to access the Cloud Storage bucket that contains the Terraform state file. This is likely because the Cloud Build service account does not have the necessary permissions to read and write objects in the bucket. To resolve this issue, you need to grant the roles/storage.objectAdmin IAM role to the Cloud Build service account on the state file bucket. This role allows the service account to create, delete, and manage objects in the bucket6. You can use the gcloud command-line tool or the Google Cloud Console to grant this role.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow Google-recommended practices. Option A is incorrect because it changes the Terraform code to use local state, which is not recommended for production or collaborative environments, as it can cause conflicts, data loss, or inconsistency. Option B is incorrect because it creates a new storage bucket with the name specified in the Terraform configuration, but it does not grant any permissions to the Cloud Build service account on the new bucket. Option C is incorrect because it grants the roles/owner IAM role to the Cloud Build service account on the project, which is too broad and violates the principle of least privilege. The roles/owner role grants full access to all resources in the project, which can pose a security risk if misused or compromised.

Rollback to previous stable version. Then you need to find what is causing the issue.

Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure. Cloud Build can import source code from Google Cloud Storage, Cloud Source Repositories, GitHub, or Bitbucket, execute a build to your specifications, and produce artifacts such as Docker containers or Java archives1. Cloud Build can also run integration tests as part of your build steps2.

You can use Cloud Build to run tests in a specific folder by specifying the path to the folder in the dir field of your build step3. For example, if you have a folder named tests that contains your integration tests, you can use the following build step to run them:

steps:

- name: 'gcr.io/cloud-builders/go'

args: ['test', '-v']

dir: 'tests'

Copy

You can use Cloud Build to trigger builds for every GitHub pull request by using the Cloud Build GitHub app. The app allows you to automatically build on Git pushes and pull requests and view your build results on GitHub and Google Cloud console4. You can configure the app to run builds on specific branches, tags, or paths5. For example, if you want to run builds on pull requests that target the master branch, you can use the following trigger configuration:

includedFiles:

- '**'

name: 'pull-request-trigger'

github:

name: 'my-repo'

owner: 'my-org'

pullRequest:

branch: '^master$'

Using Cloud Build to run tests in a specific folder and trigger builds for every GitHub pull request is a good way to continuously test your feature branch and ensure that all code is tested before changes are accepted. This way, you can catch any errors or bugs early and prevent them from affecting the main branch.

Using a Jenkins server for CI/CD pipelines is not a bad option, but it would require more setup and maintenance than using Cloud Build, which is fully managed by Google Cloud. Periodically running all tests in the feature branch is not as efficient as running tests for every pull request, as it may delay the feedback loop and increase the risk of conflicts or failures.

Using Cloud Build to run the tests after a pull request is merged is not a good practice, as it may introduce errors or bugs into the main branch that could have been prevented by testing before merging.

Asking the pull request reviewers to run the integration tests before approving the code is not a reliable way of ensuring code quality, as it depends on human intervention and may be prone to errors or oversights.

References:

1: Overview  |  Cloud Build Documentation  |  Google Cloud

2: Running integration tests  |  Cloud Build Documentation  |  Google Cloud

3: Build configuration overview  |  Cloud Build Documentation  |  Google Cloud

4: Building repositories from GitHub  |  Cloud Build Documentation  |  Google Cloud

5: Creating GitHub app triggers  |  Cloud Build Documentation  |  Google Cloud

https://www.atlassian.com/incident-management/kpis/common-metrics

https://linkedin.github.io/school-of-sre/

The correct answer is D. Modify the application to use Cloud Logging software development kit (SDK), and send log entries with a jsonPayload field.

Cloud Logging SDKs are libraries that allow you to write structured logs from your Cloud Run application. You can use the SDKs to create log entries with a jsonPayload field, which contains a JSON object with the properties of your log entry. The jsonPayload field allows you to use advanced features of Cloud Logging, such as filtering, querying, and exporting logs based on the properties of your log entry1.

To use Cloud Logging SDKs, you need to install the SDK for your programming language, and then use the SDK methods to create and send log entries to Cloud Logging. For example, if you are using Node.js, you can use the following code to write a structured log entry with a jsonPayload field2:

// Imports the Google Cloud client library

const {Logging} = require('@google-cloud/logging');

// Creates a client

const logging = new Logging();

// Selects the log to write to

const log = logging.log('my-log');

// The data to write to the log

const text = 'Hello, world!';

const metadata = {

// Set the Cloud Run service name and revision as labels

labels: {

service_name: process.env.K_SERVICE || 'unknown',

revision_name: process.env.K_REVISION || 'unknown',

},

// Set the log entry payload type and value

jsonPayload: {

message: text,

timestamp: new Date(),

},

};

// Prepares a log entry

const entry = log.entry(metadata);

// Writes the log entry

await log.write(entry);

console.log(`Logged: ${text}`);

Using Cloud Logging SDKs is the best way to convert unstructured logs to structured logs, as it provides more flexibility and control over the format and content of your log entries.

Using a Fluent Bit sidecar container is not a good option, as it adds complexity and overhead to your Cloud Run application. Fluent Bit is a lightweight log processor and forwarder that can be used to collect and parse logs from various sources and send them to different destinations3. However, Cloud Run does not support sidecar containers, so you would need to run Fluent Bit as part of your main container image. This would require modifying your Dockerfile and configuring Fluent Bit to read logs from supported locations and parse them as JSON. This is more cumbersome and less reliable than using Cloud Logging SDKs.

Using the log agent in the Cloud Run container image is not possible, as the log agent is not supported on Cloud Run. The log agent is a service that runs on Compute Engine or Google Kubernetes Engine instances and collects logs from various applications and system components. However, Cloud Run does not allow you to install or run any agents on its underlying infrastructure, as it is a fully managed service that abstracts away the details of the underlying platform.

Storing the password directly in the code is not a good practice, as it exposes sensitive information and makes it hard to change or rotate the password. It also requires rebuilding and redeploying the application each time the password changes, which adds unnecessary work and downtime.

References:

1: Writing structured logs | Cloud Run Documentation | Google Cloud

2: Write structured logs | Cloud Run Documentation | Google Cloud

3: Fluent Bit - Fast and Lightweight Log Processor & Forwarder

Logging Best Practices for Serverless Applications - Google Codelabs

About the logging agent | Cloud Logging Documentation | Google Cloud

Cloud Run FAQ | Google Cloud

The best option for detecting consumption of an error budget to protect customers and define release policies is to create a service level objective (SLO) and create an alert policy on select_slo_burn_rate. A SLO is a target value or range of values for a service level indicator (SLI) that measures some aspect of the service quality, such as availability or latency. An error budget is the amount of time or number of errors that a service can tolerate while still meeting its SLO. A select_slo_burn_rate is a metric that indicates how fast the error budget is being consumed by the service. By creating an alert policy on select_slo_burn_rate, you can trigger notifications or actions when the error budget consumption exceeds a certain threshold. This way, you can balance change, velocity, and reliability of the service by adjusting the release policies based on the error budget status.

Creating a development environment for writing code and a test environment for configurations, experiments, and load testing is the best practice to reduce the number of bugs and outages in production and to enable testers to load test new features. This way, the production environment is isolated from changes that could affect its stability and performance.

The correct answer is A. Communicate your intent to the incident team. Perform a load analysis to determine if the remaining nodes can handle the increase in traffic offloaded from the removed node, and scale appropriately. When any new nodes report healthy, drain traffic from the unhealthy node, and remove the unhealthy node from service.

This answer follows the Google-recommended practices for incident management, as described in the Chapter 9 - Incident Response, Google SRE Book1. According to this source, some of the best practices are:

• Maintain a clear line of command. Designate clearly defined roles. Keep a working record of debugging and mitigation as you go. Declare incidents early and often.
• Communicate your intent before taking any action that might affect the service or the incident response. This helps to avoid confusion, duplication of work, or unintended consequences.
• Perform a load analysis before removing a node from the load balancer pool, as this might affect the capacity and performance of the service. Scale the pool as necessary to handle the expected load.
• Drain traffic from the unhealthy node before removing it from service, as this helps to avoid dropping requests or causing errors for users.

Answer A follows these best practices by communicating the intent to the incident team, performing a load analysis and scaling the pool, and draining traffic from the unhealthy node before removing it.

Answer B does not follow the best practice of performing a load analysis before adding or removing nodes, as this might cause overloading or underutilization of resources.

Answer C does not follow the best practice of communicating the intent before taking any action, as this might cause confusion or conflict with other responders.

Answer D does not follow the best practice of draining traffic from the unhealthy node before removing it, as this might cause errors for users.

References:

1: Chapter 9 - Incident Response, Google SRE Book

The most probable cause of the database timeout is an increased number of connections to the Cloud SQL instance. This could happen if the application does not close connections properly or if it creates too many connections at once. You can check the number of connections to the Cloud SQL instance using Cloud Monitoring or Cloud SQL Admin API .

The correct answer is A. Notify the team that their error budget is used up. Negotiate with the team for a launch freeze or tolerate a slightly worse user experience.

According to the Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) practices, an error budget is the amount of unreliability that a service can tolerate without harming user satisfaction1. An error budget is derived from the service-level objectives (SLOs), which are the measurable goals for the service quality2. When a service exceeds its error budget, it means that it has violated its SLOs and may have negatively impacted the users. In this case, the SRE team should notify the product team that their error budget is used up and negotiate with them for a launch freeze or a lower SLO3. A launch freeze means that no new features are deployed until the service reliability is restored. A lower SLO means that the product team accepts a slightly worse user experience in exchange for launching new features. Both options require a trade-off between reliability and innovation, and should be agreed upon by both teams.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow the SRE practices. Option B is incorrect because it violates the principle of error budget autonomy, which means that each service should have its own error budget and SLOs, and should not borrow or reallocate them from other services4. Option C is incorrect because it does not address the root cause of the error budget overspend, and may create unrealistic expectations for the service reliability. Option D is incorrect because it does not prevent the possibility of introducing new errors or bugs with the feature launch, which may further degrade the service quality and user satisfaction.

https://cloud.google.com/architecture/customizing-stackdriver-logs-fluentd

Besides the list of default logs that the Logging agent streams by default, you can customize the Logging agent to send additional logs to Logging or to adjust agent settings by adding input configurations. The configuration definitions in these sections apply to the fluent-plugin-google-cloud output plugin only and specify how logs are transformed and ingested into Cloud Logging. https://cloud.google.com/logging/docs/agent/logging/configuration#configure

(https://sre.google/workbook/implementing-slos/#slo-decision-matrix )